MoS launches NSCSTI 2.0 Framework for Civil Services Training Standards (See 'Corp Brief') Petroleum dealers must become active partners in Energy Transition: Puri (See 'Corp Brief') TRAI organises Workshop for rating of Properties for Digital Connectivity (See 'Corp Brief') Promote innovation in agriculture and organic farming: Chouhan (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - If trader imports and sells goods bearing trademark of another company, such trader can't sue another authorized dealer of trademark holder for infringement: HC (See 'Legal Desk') India charts bold upstream Energy Strategy at Urja Varta 2025 (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Merely placing slogan prominently on goods/ advertisements, does not suffice to establish same as source identifier, unless consumers associate that phrase uniquely with such goods/ services: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Giriraj Singh inaugurates India Trend Fair 2025 in Tokyo (See 'Corp Brief') SEBI - Accrual of interest upon default is automatic and flows from nature of liability serving to compensate for time value of money and disruption caused by delayed payment, rather than to impose additional punitive burden: SC (See 'Legal Desk') Indian Culinary Institute kicks Off orientation for BBA and MBA Culinary Arts Students (See 'Corp Brief') NI Act - Complaint u/s 138 for dishonour of cheque issued in name of partnership firm is maintainable against individual partners of firm, even when partnership firm is not arrayed as accused: SC (See 'Legal Desk') National Zoological Park Observes World Snake Day (See 'Corp Brief') A&C - Communications between parties through WhatsApp and e-mails can constitute valid arbitration agreement: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Giriraj Singh begins official visit to Japan (See 'Corp Brief') 'Ease of Doing Research & Development' held at Indian IIT, Jammu (See 'Corp Brief') Competition Act - allegations relating to procedural lapses, such as non-publication on GeM & relaxation of bid conditions, do not fall within the scope of anti-competitive behavior under the Act: CCI (See 'Legal Desk') NHAI Report highlights Initiatives taken for Environment Sustainability (See 'Corp Brief') CCI okays acquisition of 100% shareholding in SMC Power by Rungta Sons (See 'Corp Brief') CCI okays acquisition of Target Business from SGRE and SGREL by PPPL, TPG REGen (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Official broadcasters of FIFA World Cup 2025 are granted injunction against illegal streaming by rogue website: HC (See 'Legal Desk') MNRE has provided over Rs 200 Cr funding to NCPRE, IIT Bombay over 15 years (See 'Corp Brief') BCCL pioneers Women Empowerment in Healthcare and Technical Domain (See 'Corp Brief') Scindia charts Vision for Grassroots-Driven Growth at India Post Business Meet (See 'Corp Brief') Murmu to confer Swachh Survekshan 2024-25 awards (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - Where appellant's funds were already in ED's possession, there is no longer any need to continue the debit freeze & appellant can operate the relevant bank account: HC (See 'Legal Desk') President's discretionary grant of Rs 62.4 lakh disbursed to meritorious EMRS Students (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Patents Act does not impose any bar on amendment of patent application or specification at appellate stage: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Mandaviya announces 'Youth Spiritual Summit' in Varanasi (See 'Corp Brief') Misc - Land Acquisition Collector can't be said to had tendered compensation to recorded owner of subject land, simply based on notice of award u/s 12(2) of LA Act, in absence of communication inviting landowners to receive compensation : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Gadkari lays foundation stone for 9 NH projects in Karnataka (See 'Corp Brief') A&C - Merely pointing to existence of arbitration clause, without invoking statutory remedy u/s 8, is insufficient to seek dismissal of plaint on grounds of lack of jurisdiction: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Coal India's First Fully Women-Operated Dispensary Inaugurated at SECL (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - 'PLUTO' remains dominant part of both marks; Minor differences in presentation or added descriptors do not mitigate risk of confusion among consumers: HC (See 'Legal Desk') IPR - Rejection of patent application on blatantly illogical and misconceived reasoning, namely that invention was 'too simple' to qualify as patentable, was not justified: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Fifth Edition of National Startup Awards invites nominations (See 'Corp Brief')

Group insolvency in Indian insolvency regime

Published: Jun 16, 2023

By Yogendra Aldak, Partner, Pranav Mundra, Senior Associate and Bhavya Shukla, Associate, Lakshmikumaran and Sridharan, Attorneys

 THE law on corporate insolvency resolution process ('CIRP') in India, is majorly focused on the resolution of single entity rather than a group of entities. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code ('Code') provides for initiation of CIRP by creditors when the debt of an entity reaches the threshold. Even if the entities are interconnected, there is no provision in the Code to consolidate the CIRP of all of them. Where group entities are significantly interlinked, it could be value destructive to not recognize such interlinkage. Where the business of different entities is dependent on each other, or various entities have common assets, or where there are common liabilities and related party transactions among entities, carrying of CIRP for each distinct entity in isolation may raise distinct problems, which may not exist otherwise.

To bridge this gap, the company tribunals have attempted to resolve debts of entities that are inextricably linked or are part of a group and where it is necessary for a few or all of them to go through CIRP. In the case of State Bank of India v. Videocon Industries Limited 1, CIRP was initiated by the Bank against 15 companies of Videocon group across various National Company Law Tribunal ('NCLT'). The NCLT Mumbai Bench ordered for consolidation of 13 CIRPs, thereby introducing the concept of group insolvency in India. While considering the law on group insolvency as developed in UK and US, the Mumbai Bench prescribed certain yardstick to ascertain consolidation - Common control, Common directors, Common assets, Common liabilities, Inter-dependence, Inter lacing of finance, Pooling of resources, Co-existence for survival, intricate link of subsidiaries, inter-twined of accounts, inter-looping of debts, singleness of economics of units, cross shareholding, Inter dependence due to intertwined consolidated accounts, Common pooling of resources, etc. The bench clarified that the list was not exhaustive but only prima-facie governing factors to activate the process of 'consolidation'.

The yardstick prescribed in the Videocon Case was followed in Axis Bank Ltd. & Ors. v. Lavasa Corp. Ltd 2 wherein, the financial creditors of the holding company filed for consolidation of its CIRP along with two of its subsidiaries to settle the debts of the entire Lavasa group. The CIRP of Lavasa group was ordered to be consolidated. Even in Radico Khaitan Ltd. v. BT & FC Pvt. Ltd.3, the operational creditor-Radico Khaitan moved the appellate tribunal challenging the order of the NCLT rejecting the request for consolidation. Applying the principles developed in Videocon Case , the appellate tribunal directed for consolidation of two entities.

The need for a holistic framework for group insolvency was recognized by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India ('IBBI') which constituted a Working Group to consider the elements coordination and consolidation in a corporate group. The Working Group addressed key aspects of identification of a group, extent of grouping and mechanism involved. It recommended implementation of group insolvency in two phases – first phase to apply only to domestic companies and second phase to introduce the group insolvency mechanism in cross-border entities. The first phase provided for adoption of rules to coordinate different CIRPs of group entities without disturbing the division of assets and substantive claims of creditors of each of the group entities. The mechanism aimed at lowering costs and reducing time associated with different CIRPs. It consists of elements such as joint application, information sharing between insolvency resolution professionals /NCLTs /Committee of Creditors, consolidation of CIRPs before a single NCLT, creation of group creditor's committees etc. Depending on the implementation of the first phase, the second phase was suggested to be introduced. The second phase provided for mechanism of group insolvency in cross-border CIRPs with substantial consolidation, that is, consolidating the assets and liabilities of group companies so that they are considered to be a single economic unit.

The report of the Working Group has also been considered by the Cross-Border Insolvency Rules/Regulations Committee ('CBIRC') which was constituted by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs ('MCA') to provide recommendations on group insolvency based on a review of recommendations of UNCITRAL Model Law on Enterprise Group Insolvency ('MLEGI') and the Code. The CBIRC in its report inter-alia recommended that MLEGI may not be adopted in India till the time the law on single entity cross-border insolvency is enacted. However, it emphasized on the need for the Code to provide for the manner of undertaking CIRP of group entities that is distinct from the current single-entity approach.

The NCLTs in India have recently been facing special issues arising out of interconnection of CIRP of an entity with its other group companies. Such issues have caught the attention of

IBBI and MCA as well, who have constituted committees seeking recommendations for implementation of group insolvency framework in India. With the recommendations being affirmative, the time is ripe for the Parliament to consider the recommendations and put in place a statutory framework for group insolvency in India. This would not only ensure a timely and effective resolution of insolvency among group entities, but also maximize the value of their assets and balance the interest of all stakeholders of each of the group entities.

(The views expressed are strictly personal.)

12019 SCC OnLine NCLT 745.

2Order dated February 26, 2020 in MA 3664/2019 in C.P.(IB)-1765, 1757 & 574/MB/2018

3Order dated March 26, 2021 in CA(AT) (INS) No. 919/2020 .

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES