Scindia hails growth of Indo-French ties at Indo-French North-East Investment Forum (See 'Corp Brief') Misc - Court under Order IX Rule 26 has power to appoint Local Commissioner to ascertain market value of any property, or amount of mesne profits or damages: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Scindia confers Bharat Ratna Hazarika National Awards (See 'Corp Brief') Controller General of Accounts inaugurates Delhi circle Pension Campaign (See 'Corp Brief') Competition Law - Mere dissatisfaction with tender terms or with rejection of bid cannot lead to presumption of imposition of unfair or discriminatory conditions and abuse of dominance: CCI (See 'Legal Desk') Coal India Celebrates 50 Glorious Years of Nation Building (See 'Corp Brief') Scindia lays bricks for Integrated Sohra Tourism Circuit (See 'Corp Brief') Naidu inaugurates creche facility at Udaan Bhawan (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Mere expiry of trademark registration does not, by itself, justify removal from Register, and such removal must be preceded by strict compliance with mandatory requirement of issuing a Form O-3 notice: HC (See 'Legal Desk') GeM organises Session on 'Compliance with Law in Public Procurement' (See 'Corp Brief') MoSPI signs MoU with IICA to develop SDG Alignment Framework (See 'Corp Brief') India's emphasis on overflight in Indo-Pacific is not against any country: RM (See 'Corp Brief') FEMA - Inward remittances labelled 'grants' may be treated as capital account transactions if there are contingent liabilities or obligations that convert them into capital in substance: SAFEMA (See 'Legal Desk') Marine Fisheries Census 2025 goes fully Digital (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - CRPS holders even at stage when redemption period has expired, remain shareholders and do not become creditors and do not fulfil definition of financial creditor u/s 5(7): SC (See 'Legal Desk') India, Netherlands hold 8th Joint Working Group Meeting on Agriculture (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Moon-shine defense taken to thwart recovery proceedings initiated by Financial Creditor under SARFAESI, can defeat recovery process initiated by Financial Creditor: NCLT (See 'Legal Desk') EPFO hosts Gurcharan Das in 22nd Edition of 'Reimagining Governance' (See 'Corp Brief') NI Act - Statutory demand under Proviso (b) to Sec 138 does not survive if figure claimed is numerically different from dishonoured cheque, even if discrepancy is pleaded to be inadvertent: SC (See 'Legal Desk') BSNL Achieves 93% Revenue Run Rate in Q2 (See 'Corp Brief') A&C - If notice of arbitration was delayed and barred by limitation and arbitration request itself was made two years after initial notice, appointment of arbitrator in partnership dispute can't be done: SC (See 'Legal Desk') Chouhan inaugurates National FPO Conclave 2025 in Delhi (See 'Corp Brief') Competition Law - Google abused its dominant position in Online Search Advertising services market in India by imposing unfair and discriminatory terms through its Google Ads Policies in violation of Sec 4 of Competition Act: CCI (See 'Legal Desk') Government intervention and Corporate governance (See CORP EINSICHT)

RBI slaps penalty of 90.00 lakh on Vasai Vikas Sahakari Bank

Published: Oct 27, 2021

MUMBAI, OCT 27, 2021: THE Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has, by an order dated October 26, 2021 imposed a monetary penalty of Rs.90.00 lakh on Vasai Vikas Sahakari Bank Ltd., Vasai, Maharashtra (the bank) for non-compliance with the directions issued by RBI on "Management of Advances - UCBs", "Income Recognition, Asset Classification, Provisioning and Other Related Matters - UCBs", with the specific directions issued to the bank vide RBI's letter dated November 22, 2018 and with the provisions of section 31 read with section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (the Act). This penalty has been imposed in exercise of powers vested in RBI conferred under section 47A (1)(c) read with sections 46 (4) (i) and 56 of the Act, taking into account failure of the bank to adhere to the aforesaid directions issued by RBI and provisions of section 31 read with section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. This action is based on deficiency in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the bank with its customers.

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES