IICA convenes 5th Inter-Ministerial Consultation on Responsible Business Conduct and ESG (See 'Corp Brief') BCCL Organizes Interaction with NRS Linkage and CIL SWMA e-Auction Consumers (See 'Corp Brief') Madnaviya & Kumaraswamy lay foundation of indoor sports complex in Karnataka (See 'Corp Brief') A&C - Juridical seat of arbitration is determinative factor for conferring exclusive supervisory jurisdiction on court: HC (See 'Legal Desk') India's progress in reducing Tuberculosis Incidence has Outpaced Global Average: Nadda (See 'Corp Brief') Rs 100 crore sanctioned for Integrated Aqua Park Project in Anantnag (See 'Corp Brief') Reddy inaugurates Multiple Projects in WCL (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - If mortgaged properties are to be auctioned by bank or settled with borrower which may result in concealment, it would be only of those properties which was considered to be assets disproportionate to known source: SAFEMA (See 'Legal Desk') India moving from Healthcare Follower to Global Leader in Precision Medicine and Biomanufacturing: MoS (See 'Corp Brief') Companies Act - Technical provisions of Companies Act cannot be relied on to evade compliance with a Court decree prohibiting the judgment debtor from transferring the shares to any third party: HC (See 'Legal Desk') SECL's Vigilance-led Initiative 'Prayas' Ensures Timely PF & Pension Settlement (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - Appearance of Appellant, ordinarily operating in Mumbai, before SAFEMA Appellate Tribunal at Delhi, does not confer territorial jurisdiction to the Delhi High Court over Appellant: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Agrinnovate India presents Rs.3.4 Crore dividend to Chouhan (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Once Resolution Plan is approved by NCLT u/s 31 of IBC, it becomes binding on all stakeholders, and all claims not provided for in plan stand extinguished: HC (See 'Legal Desk') 6 Railway Stations in West Bengal redeveloped under Amrit Bharat Station Scheme (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Party seeking cancellation of registered trademark on grounds of similarity and prior rights must first establish its own prior and continuous use of its mark as trademark: HC (See 'Legal Desk') NHAI receives warm response from Bidders for Construction of Kaliabor to Numaligarh Section of NH (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Application of Discount for Lack of Marketability is permissible valuation methodology under Indian Accounting Standards for determining fair value of unlisted, illiquid shares in context of capital reduction: SC (See 'Legal Desk') Supreme Court Clears Path For Single Insolvency Proceedings Against Linked Group Companies (See CORP EINSICHT)

CCI penalises beer companies for indulging into cartelisation

Published: Sep 25, 2021

By TIOLCorplaws News Service

NEW DELHI, SEPT 25, 2021: THE Competition Commission of India (‘CCI') passed a final order against three beer companies, namely United Breweries Limited (‘UBL'), SABMiller India Limited (now renamed as Anheuser Busch InBev India Ltd. after being acquired by Anheuser Busch InBev SA/NV) (‘AB InBev') and Carlsberg India Private Limited (‘CIPL') for indulging in cartelisation in the sale and supply of beer in various States and Union Territories in India, including through the platform of All India Brewers' Association (‘AIBA').

As AIBA was found to be actively involved in facilitating such cartelisation, CCI also held AIBA to be in contravention of the provisions of Competition Act, 2002 (the ‘Act'), apart from the beer companies. The period of cartel was held to be from 2009 to at least 10.10.2018 (the date on which the Director General (‘DG') conducted search and seizure operations at the premises of the beer companies), with CIPL joining in from 2012 and AIBA serving as a platform for facilitating such cartelisation since 2013. All three beer companies were lesser penalty applicants before CCI.

Based on evidences of regular communications between the parties collected by the DG during search and seizure, and on the basis of the disclosures made in the lesser penalty applications, CCI found that the three companies engaged in price co-ordination in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(3)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the ‘Act') in the States of Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan, West Bengal, National Capital Territory of Delhi and the Union Territory of Puducherry, in collectively restricting supply of beer in the States of Maharashtra, Odisha and West Bengal in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(3)(b) of the Act, and in sharing of market in the State of Maharashtra as well as co-ordination with respect to supply of beer to premium institutions in the city of Bengaluru in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(3)(c) of the Act. CCI also found co-ordination amongst UBL and AB InBev with respect to purchase of second-hand bottles. Further, 4 individuals of UBL, 4 individuals of AB InBev, 6 individuals of CIPL and the Director General of AIBA, were held by CCI to be liable for the anti-competitive conduct of their respective companies/association, in terms of Section 48 of the Act.

Giving benefit of reduction in penalty under the provisions of Section 46 of the Act of 100% to AB InBev and its individuals, 40% to UBL and its individuals and 20% to CIPL and its individuals. The CCI directed UBL and CIPL to pay penalties of approx. Rs 750 crore and Rs 120 crore respectively, besides passing a cease-and-desist order.

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES