Govt reviews steps for upskilling & increase womens' participation in MSME sector (See 'Corp Brief') PM Vishwakarma Scheme - holistic support for artisans of 18 traditional trades; 23.09 Lakh beneficiaries trained (See 'Corp Brief') Govt notifies DPDP Act & Rules thereof; simplified framework for startups & data fiduciaries (See 'Corp Brief') SARFAESI - as per Sec 15 of the Act, if borrower's management is taken over by secured creditor, the management may be restored upon full repayment of debt: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Afforestation, ecological restoration - coal mining cos steps to ensure ecological balance (See 'Corp Brief') Competition Act - allegations primarily concerning contraventions of the Companies Act or Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports directives, do not relate to anti-competitive conduct or violation of the Act: CCI (See 'Legal Desk') RBI issues guidelines for banks to provide customer services in regional languages (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - If bank has released approved payments from TRA account operated by them, then bank was monitoring these transactions during entire CIRP: IBBI (See 'Legal Desk') Govt releases Credit Assessment Model for MSMEs to enhance digitally driven loan appraisal (See 'Corp Brief') IBBI - Cannot be expected to maintain information with respect to other laws outside its purview: IBBI (See 'Legal Desk') Govt's aid measures for MSMEs - TReDS, Rs 9000 Crore infusion (See 'Corp Brief') Indian media & entertainment sector to maintain growth despite AI disruption: Secy (See 'Corp Brief') PBPT - Transactions are rightly deemed benami u/s 2(9)(D) of PBPTA, where person who provided consideration for properties was not traceable: SAFEMA Tribunal (See 'Legal Desk') Sustainable coal mining - Govt simplifies approval for geological exploration & reports (See 'Corp Brief') Benami - Benami transaction is considered not only in case of transfer of property by beneficial owner for his ultimate benefit in future, but even if such properties is held by benamidar: SAFEMA (See 'Legal Desk') IITF-2025 - FCI Pavilion showcasing modernised foodgrain management bags bronze medal (See 'Corp Brief') Copyright Act - Police have jurisdiction to register FIR u/s 33EEC of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act in conjunction with cognizable offence under Copyright Act; registration of copyright not mandatory for criminal proceedings upon infringement: HC (See 'Legal Desk') VO Chidambarnar port receives first Clinker vessel following MoU with Ambuja Cement Ltd (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - Sweep of Sec 5(1) is not limited to accused named in criminal activity relating to scheduled offence, but shall apply equally to person who is involved in any activity connected with proceeds of crime: SAFEMA (See 'Legal Desk')

CCI penalises beer companies for indulging into cartelisation

Published: Sep 25, 2021

By TIOLCorplaws News Service

NEW DELHI, SEPT 25, 2021: THE Competition Commission of India (‘CCI') passed a final order against three beer companies, namely United Breweries Limited (‘UBL'), SABMiller India Limited (now renamed as Anheuser Busch InBev India Ltd. after being acquired by Anheuser Busch InBev SA/NV) (‘AB InBev') and Carlsberg India Private Limited (‘CIPL') for indulging in cartelisation in the sale and supply of beer in various States and Union Territories in India, including through the platform of All India Brewers' Association (‘AIBA').

As AIBA was found to be actively involved in facilitating such cartelisation, CCI also held AIBA to be in contravention of the provisions of Competition Act, 2002 (the ‘Act'), apart from the beer companies. The period of cartel was held to be from 2009 to at least 10.10.2018 (the date on which the Director General (‘DG') conducted search and seizure operations at the premises of the beer companies), with CIPL joining in from 2012 and AIBA serving as a platform for facilitating such cartelisation since 2013. All three beer companies were lesser penalty applicants before CCI.

Based on evidences of regular communications between the parties collected by the DG during search and seizure, and on the basis of the disclosures made in the lesser penalty applications, CCI found that the three companies engaged in price co-ordination in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(3)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the ‘Act') in the States of Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan, West Bengal, National Capital Territory of Delhi and the Union Territory of Puducherry, in collectively restricting supply of beer in the States of Maharashtra, Odisha and West Bengal in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(3)(b) of the Act, and in sharing of market in the State of Maharashtra as well as co-ordination with respect to supply of beer to premium institutions in the city of Bengaluru in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(3)(c) of the Act. CCI also found co-ordination amongst UBL and AB InBev with respect to purchase of second-hand bottles. Further, 4 individuals of UBL, 4 individuals of AB InBev, 6 individuals of CIPL and the Director General of AIBA, were held by CCI to be liable for the anti-competitive conduct of their respective companies/association, in terms of Section 48 of the Act.

Giving benefit of reduction in penalty under the provisions of Section 46 of the Act of 100% to AB InBev and its individuals, 40% to UBL and its individuals and 20% to CIPL and its individuals. The CCI directed UBL and CIPL to pay penalties of approx. Rs 750 crore and Rs 120 crore respectively, besides passing a cease-and-desist order.

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES