PitchX @ ESTIC 2025 Ignites India's DeepTech Future (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Unfair advantage of reputation and goodwill amassed by plaintiff's marks, calls for passing off against defendant: HC (See 'Legal Desk') DGT, Autodesk join hands to enhance Skills for India's Vocational Workforce (See 'Corp Brief') FERA - If exporter chose to realise export proceeds in the Indian Currency, then he had to ensure that export is made within bilateral framework of trade: SAFEMA (See 'Legal Desk') Textiles Mission supports development of Indigenous Thermal Testing Instruments (See 'Corp Brief') Benami - Even if there are cash infusions into bank accounts of alleged benamidar, no provisional attachment can be made in absence of evidence to show that such infusions are made by beneficial owner: SAFEMA (See 'Legal Desk') Ministry of Tourism participates in World Travel Market (See 'Corp Brief') DoT leads thematic session on India's telecom innovation (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Refusal of registration is contingent upon existence of 'likelihood of confusion': HC (See 'Legal Desk') Startup supported by DST demonstrates 500 km Quantum-Safe Network (See 'Corp Brief') Competition Law - Dominance alone does not constitute abuse u/s 4 and competition law will intervene in digital platforms only where market-wide harm, exclusionary conduct, or unfair leveraging is evident: CCI (See 'Legal Desk') MOIL achieves best-ever October Production since Inception (See 'Corp Brief') Competition Law - Back interest charges stemmed from internal bank error constituted contractual dispute and not competition law concern: CCI (See 'Legal Desk') MoS tells NRI scientists - 'You are not outsiders' (See 'Corp Brief') No Blanket cancellations of REIA-Awarded Projects: Govt (See 'Corp Brief') India, Israel ink MoU for co-development & co-production of advanced defence tech (See 'Corp Brief') SARFAESI - CJM's role under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act is limited to ministerial functions and does not involve adjudication: HC (See 'Legal Desk') EPFO, NITI Aayog organize Seminar on Social Security in Electronic Industry (See 'Corp Brief') MeitY generates Rs 41 lakh Scrap Revenue (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Use of essential element in competing marks creates a likelihood of confusion, and continued registration of impugned mark is not permitted: HC (See 'Legal Desk') India strengthens global partnerships with Mauritius and UNESCAP in Doha (See 'Corp Brief') DRDO leads thematic session on 'Electronics & Semiconductor Manufacturing' (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - As per settled precedent, property of equivalent value to proceeds of crime can be attached, even if Appellant is not accused in scheduled offence: SAFEMA Appellate Tribunal (See 'Legal Desk') Scindia hails growth of Indo-French ties at Indo-French North-East Investment Forum (See 'Corp Brief') Misc - Court under Order IX Rule 26 has power to appoint Local Commissioner to ascertain market value of any property, or amount of mesne profits or damages: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Scindia confers Bharat Ratna Hazarika National Awards (See 'Corp Brief') Controller General of Accounts inaugurates Delhi circle Pension Campaign (See 'Corp Brief') Competition Law - Mere dissatisfaction with tender terms or with rejection of bid cannot lead to presumption of imposition of unfair or discriminatory conditions and abuse of dominance: CCI (See 'Legal Desk') Coal India Celebrates 50 Glorious Years of Nation Building (See 'Corp Brief') Scindia lays bricks for Integrated Sohra Tourism Circuit (See 'Corp Brief') Naidu inaugurates creche facility at Udaan Bhawan (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Mere expiry of trademark registration does not, by itself, justify removal from Register, and such removal must be preceded by strict compliance with mandatory requirement of issuing a Form O-3 notice: HC (See 'Legal Desk') GeM organises Session on 'Compliance with Law in Public Procurement' (See 'Corp Brief') MoSPI signs MoU with IICA to develop SDG Alignment Framework (See 'Corp Brief') India's emphasis on overflight in Indo-Pacific is not against any country: RM (See 'Corp Brief') FEMA - Inward remittances labelled 'grants' may be treated as capital account transactions if there are contingent liabilities or obligations that convert them into capital in substance: SAFEMA (See 'Legal Desk') Government intervention and Corporate governance (See CORP EINSICHT)

CCI penalises beer companies for indulging into cartelisation

Published: Sep 25, 2021

By TIOLCorplaws News Service

NEW DELHI, SEPT 25, 2021: THE Competition Commission of India (‘CCI') passed a final order against three beer companies, namely United Breweries Limited (‘UBL'), SABMiller India Limited (now renamed as Anheuser Busch InBev India Ltd. after being acquired by Anheuser Busch InBev SA/NV) (‘AB InBev') and Carlsberg India Private Limited (‘CIPL') for indulging in cartelisation in the sale and supply of beer in various States and Union Territories in India, including through the platform of All India Brewers' Association (‘AIBA').

As AIBA was found to be actively involved in facilitating such cartelisation, CCI also held AIBA to be in contravention of the provisions of Competition Act, 2002 (the ‘Act'), apart from the beer companies. The period of cartel was held to be from 2009 to at least 10.10.2018 (the date on which the Director General (‘DG') conducted search and seizure operations at the premises of the beer companies), with CIPL joining in from 2012 and AIBA serving as a platform for facilitating such cartelisation since 2013. All three beer companies were lesser penalty applicants before CCI.

Based on evidences of regular communications between the parties collected by the DG during search and seizure, and on the basis of the disclosures made in the lesser penalty applications, CCI found that the three companies engaged in price co-ordination in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(3)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the ‘Act') in the States of Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan, West Bengal, National Capital Territory of Delhi and the Union Territory of Puducherry, in collectively restricting supply of beer in the States of Maharashtra, Odisha and West Bengal in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(3)(b) of the Act, and in sharing of market in the State of Maharashtra as well as co-ordination with respect to supply of beer to premium institutions in the city of Bengaluru in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(3)(c) of the Act. CCI also found co-ordination amongst UBL and AB InBev with respect to purchase of second-hand bottles. Further, 4 individuals of UBL, 4 individuals of AB InBev, 6 individuals of CIPL and the Director General of AIBA, were held by CCI to be liable for the anti-competitive conduct of their respective companies/association, in terms of Section 48 of the Act.

Giving benefit of reduction in penalty under the provisions of Section 46 of the Act of 100% to AB InBev and its individuals, 40% to UBL and its individuals and 20% to CIPL and its individuals. The CCI directed UBL and CIPL to pay penalties of approx. Rs 750 crore and Rs 120 crore respectively, besides passing a cease-and-desist order.

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES