Department of Youth Affairs to host BRICS Youth Council Meeting (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Only crystallised claims as on effective date are payable on pro-rata basis from designated Operational Creditors Settlement Amount: SC (See 'Legal Desk') RDDBFI - Borrowers cannot cherry-pick figures from bank certificates while ignoring standard accounting treatment of interest after NPA classification: SC (See 'Legal Desk') IPR - Holding subsequent trademark registration does not override prior court injunction protecting visual get-up: HC (See 'Legal Desk') PSB Confluence 2026 - deposit mobilisation, banking for youth & investment cycles on agenda (See 'Corp Brief') A&C - Continuation of arbitration proceedings against some guarantors while statutory interim moratorium u/s 96 of IBC is in effect regarding 'debt' violates fundamental policy of Indian law: HC (See 'Legal Desk') IBC - Rights issue that does not comply with the mandatory timing and procedural requirements under company law, and which reduces majority shareholders into minority and transfers control, constitutes oppression: NCLT (See 'Legal Desk') DFS highlights mechanism for Timely Redressal of Insurance Policyholders' Grievances (See 'Corp Brief') CCRAS-NIIMH signs MoU with Sevadhi Museum and Indological Research Institute for Digitization (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Second proviso to Rule 30(9) of Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014, acts as mandatory statutory bar, which prevents Regional Director from allowing shifting of registered office while appeal against resolution plan is pending: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Over 2 Lakh Villages, Now 'Har Ghar Jal' Certified (See 'Corp Brief') Companies Act - Assets of a company belong to the entity and its creditors, not its shareholders; transfer of company assets seemingly to place them beyond creditors' reach is impermissible: HC (See 'Legal Desk') MSDE convenes India-Japan Stakeholder Consultation to strengthen skilling (See 'Corp Brief') Competition law - Dealership termination, even if commercially harsh, does not by itself become competition law violation unless there is material showing an anti-competitive agreement causing dominance and abuse: CCI (See 'Legal Desk') Naidu flags off Tiranga Rally under Har Ghar Tiranga Campaign 2026 (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - EPC contract cannot be said to be frustrated by efflux of time merely because works have been suspended due to non-payment: SC (See 'Legal Desk') Capital Market - Trading while in possession of Unpublished Price Sensitive Information automatically triggers insider trading liability: SC (See 'Legal Desk') States recognised for Strong Performance in Anemia Mukt Bharat Abhiyaan (See 'Corp Brief') Misc - Winding-up proceeding and civil suit for recovery of money are distinct and independent remedies, and initiation of one does not impact limitation for other: SC (See 'Legal Desk') Patents - Invoking common general knowledge as basis for rejecting patent application without identifying & substantiating source of such knowledge is impermissible in a quasi-judicial order u/s 15 of the Act: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Gaj Gaurav Awards 2026 conferred for Exemplary Contributions to Elephant Conservation (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - In infringement action u/s 29(2)(b) of Trade Marks Act, where marks are similar but not identical, burden lies strictly on plaintiff to establish that similarity is likely to cause confusion: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Competition - Business model of online food delivery inherently differs from direct restaurant sales - price differential between two does not per se establish abusive conduct per the Competition Act: CCI (See 'Legal Desk') Tete-a-tete around AI in banking sector often begins with algorithms (See CORP EINSICHT)

CCI penalises beer companies for indulging into cartelisation

Published: Sep 25, 2021

By TIOLCorplaws News Service

NEW DELHI, SEPT 25, 2021: THE Competition Commission of India (‘CCI') passed a final order against three beer companies, namely United Breweries Limited (‘UBL'), SABMiller India Limited (now renamed as Anheuser Busch InBev India Ltd. after being acquired by Anheuser Busch InBev SA/NV) (‘AB InBev') and Carlsberg India Private Limited (‘CIPL') for indulging in cartelisation in the sale and supply of beer in various States and Union Territories in India, including through the platform of All India Brewers' Association (‘AIBA').

As AIBA was found to be actively involved in facilitating such cartelisation, CCI also held AIBA to be in contravention of the provisions of Competition Act, 2002 (the ‘Act'), apart from the beer companies. The period of cartel was held to be from 2009 to at least 10.10.2018 (the date on which the Director General (‘DG') conducted search and seizure operations at the premises of the beer companies), with CIPL joining in from 2012 and AIBA serving as a platform for facilitating such cartelisation since 2013. All three beer companies were lesser penalty applicants before CCI.

Based on evidences of regular communications between the parties collected by the DG during search and seizure, and on the basis of the disclosures made in the lesser penalty applications, CCI found that the three companies engaged in price co-ordination in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(3)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the ‘Act') in the States of Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan, West Bengal, National Capital Territory of Delhi and the Union Territory of Puducherry, in collectively restricting supply of beer in the States of Maharashtra, Odisha and West Bengal in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(3)(b) of the Act, and in sharing of market in the State of Maharashtra as well as co-ordination with respect to supply of beer to premium institutions in the city of Bengaluru in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(3)(c) of the Act. CCI also found co-ordination amongst UBL and AB InBev with respect to purchase of second-hand bottles. Further, 4 individuals of UBL, 4 individuals of AB InBev, 6 individuals of CIPL and the Director General of AIBA, were held by CCI to be liable for the anti-competitive conduct of their respective companies/association, in terms of Section 48 of the Act.

Giving benefit of reduction in penalty under the provisions of Section 46 of the Act of 100% to AB InBev and its individuals, 40% to UBL and its individuals and 20% to CIPL and its individuals. The CCI directed UBL and CIPL to pay penalties of approx. Rs 750 crore and Rs 120 crore respectively, besides passing a cease-and-desist order.

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES