Chouhan holds post-Budget discussion with coconut farmers in Chennai (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Creditor cannot be forced to elect its remedy or apportion its claim between principal debtor and guarantor: SC (See 'Legal Desk') IBC - Judicial review by NCLT & NCLAT does not extend commercial wisdom of Committee of Creditors in evaluating and approving resolution plan: SC (See 'Legal Desk') A&C - Pre-award and post-award interest operate in distinct fields and contractual bar applicable to former cannot, by implication, be extended to latter: SC (See 'Legal Desk') MoS interacts with beneficiaries of desalination plant in Kavaratti (See 'Corp Brief') A&C - Court will not grant specific performance of contractual obligation that is contingent upon discretionary approval of third-party government authority: HC (See 'Legal Desk') A&C - Contractual clause that expressly and widely bars payment of interest on ‘any moneys due to contractor' prohibits arbitral tribunal from awarding pre-reference and pendente lite interest on all claims: HC (See 'Legal Desk') CCI approves acquisition of certain shareholding in Balaji Wafers by General Atlantic Singapore (See 'Corp Brief') CCI approves combination of Bagmane Prime Office REIT of Bagmane Developers and others (See 'Corp Brief') CCI okays acquisition of additional equity in Generali Central Insurance by Central Bank (See 'Corp Brief') India and Finland renew MoU on Environmental Cooperation (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Proof of right refers to documents showing that applicant legally owns 'right to apply for patent', which can be established through assignment or employment agreement with inventor: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Crude and Petroleum procurement: 24×7 Control Room Monitoring Supply Position (See 'Corp Brief') On World Wildlife Day 2026, PM reaffirms Commitment to Wildlife Conservation (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - valuers must ensure a reasoned valuation report to guide stakeholders in economic decision-making during insolvency, including consideration of intangible assets where relevant: IBBI (See 'Legal Desk') GPS transforming fishing community lives in Car Nicobar (See 'Corp Brief') Competition Act - disputes concerning alteration of copyrighted content & associated rights, need not be entertained where no prima facie case of anti-competitive agreement or abuse of dominant position, is made out: CCI (See 'Legal Desk') Ministry of Steel holds Interactive Session with Global Diplomats Ahead of 'Bharat Steel 2026' (See 'Corp Brief') Khadse announces unique nationwide ASMITA League to mark International Women's Day (See 'Corp Brief') IPR – Anti-dissection rule, which requires trademarks to be compared as whole, does not apply where part of mark is proven to be dominant feature: HC (See 'Legal Desk') India Summit 2026: Major AI Investment Commitments made (See 'Corp Brief') Supreme Court Clears Path For Single Insolvency Proceedings Against Linked Group Companies (See CORP EINSICHT)

CCI penalises beer companies for indulging into cartelisation

Published: Sep 25, 2021

By TIOLCorplaws News Service

NEW DELHI, SEPT 25, 2021: THE Competition Commission of India (‘CCI') passed a final order against three beer companies, namely United Breweries Limited (‘UBL'), SABMiller India Limited (now renamed as Anheuser Busch InBev India Ltd. after being acquired by Anheuser Busch InBev SA/NV) (‘AB InBev') and Carlsberg India Private Limited (‘CIPL') for indulging in cartelisation in the sale and supply of beer in various States and Union Territories in India, including through the platform of All India Brewers' Association (‘AIBA').

As AIBA was found to be actively involved in facilitating such cartelisation, CCI also held AIBA to be in contravention of the provisions of Competition Act, 2002 (the ‘Act'), apart from the beer companies. The period of cartel was held to be from 2009 to at least 10.10.2018 (the date on which the Director General (‘DG') conducted search and seizure operations at the premises of the beer companies), with CIPL joining in from 2012 and AIBA serving as a platform for facilitating such cartelisation since 2013. All three beer companies were lesser penalty applicants before CCI.

Based on evidences of regular communications between the parties collected by the DG during search and seizure, and on the basis of the disclosures made in the lesser penalty applications, CCI found that the three companies engaged in price co-ordination in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(3)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the ‘Act') in the States of Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan, West Bengal, National Capital Territory of Delhi and the Union Territory of Puducherry, in collectively restricting supply of beer in the States of Maharashtra, Odisha and West Bengal in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(3)(b) of the Act, and in sharing of market in the State of Maharashtra as well as co-ordination with respect to supply of beer to premium institutions in the city of Bengaluru in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(3)(c) of the Act. CCI also found co-ordination amongst UBL and AB InBev with respect to purchase of second-hand bottles. Further, 4 individuals of UBL, 4 individuals of AB InBev, 6 individuals of CIPL and the Director General of AIBA, were held by CCI to be liable for the anti-competitive conduct of their respective companies/association, in terms of Section 48 of the Act.

Giving benefit of reduction in penalty under the provisions of Section 46 of the Act of 100% to AB InBev and its individuals, 40% to UBL and its individuals and 20% to CIPL and its individuals. The CCI directed UBL and CIPL to pay penalties of approx. Rs 750 crore and Rs 120 crore respectively, besides passing a cease-and-desist order.

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES