DoT extends Pro-Tem Security Certification Scheme for two years from 01-01-2026 (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - Even if predicate offences were not directly linked to appellants, ingredients of money laundering under PMLA could still apply as per settled legal precedent: SAFEMA Tribunal (See 'Legal Desk') PMLA - Attachments of even bank balances can be sustained if enforcement agency satisfies statutory scheme and evidentiary requirements: SAFEMA Tribunal (See 'Legal Desk') Joshi releases Indian Standard for Electric Agricultural Tractor (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Generic or commonly descriptive word can never become trade marks on their own as they never acquire distinctiveness or a secondary meaning: HC (See 'Legal Desk') NTH signs MoU with DRDO's DMSRDE for research, testing and training collaboration (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Kohinoor's trademark registrations in Delhi and marketing agreement executed between parties in Delhi were sufficient to vest territorial jurisdiction in Court: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Gypsum Board Testing and Micro-Characterisation Laboratories Inaugurated (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Paramount consideration should be interest of homebuyers who are entitled to allotment and possession of completed units: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Govt notifies Colliery Control (Amendment) Rules, 2025 (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - If marks/trade dress of parties, are similar, and areas of operation/business are same, and target consumers are also similar, there is complete likelihood that deception and confusion will occur with consumers: HC (See 'Legal Desk') NIFTEM-K signs MoU with Ministry of Minority Affairs to implement PM Vikas Scheme (See 'Corp Brief') A&C - Developer's failure to establish escrow account and its prolonged delay in project completion demonstrated financial indiscipline: HC (See 'Legal Desk') CSIR Labs driving Atmanirbhar Bharat through indigenous technologies: MoS (See 'Corp Brief') A&C - DMRC is not in violation of obligations under Concession Agreement, if DMRC had co-operated with PDL and sub-licensee and non-completion of project was because of failure of PDL: HC (See 'Legal Desk') India now sets Global Benchmarks in Space, Defence, and Innovation: MoS (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - Provisional attachments under Section 5 of PMLA can be initiated without chargesheet under Section 173 of CrPC, based on sufficient material: HC (See 'Legal Desk')

NFRA report finds fault with appointment of auditor for IL&FS

Published: Sep 24, 2021

By TIOLCorplaws News Service

NEW DELHI, SEPT 24, 2021: THE National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) has issued Audit Quality Review (AQR) report of the statutory audit of IL&FS Transportation Networks Limited (ITNL) for the Financial Year 2017-18.

The statutory auditor for this engagement was SRBC & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants.

The AQR has been conducted pursuant to Section 132(2)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013 and NFRA Rules, 2018 which require the NFRA to, inter alia, monitor and enforce the compliance with accounting standards and auditing standards India.

Some of the significant conclusions of NFRA in the report are as follows:

The initial appointment of SRBC & Co LLP, and the continuation of SRBC & Co LLP, as statutory auditor of ITNL, was prima facie illegal and void.

The Audit Firm has failed to appropriately and sufficiently evaluate the use of the going concern basis of accounting by the Management and has thus failed to note the implications thereof in the Auditor's Report.

ITNL's financial exposure to its subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures amounting to Rs. 3,346 crore was not properly valued as per the applicable Accounting Standards.

The Company's losses during 2017-18 were understated by at least Rs. 2021 crore on account of unjustified reversal of Expected Credit Loss (ECL) on loans given to the SPV and on trade receivables, and due to incorrect impairment valuation. This is excluding the impact due to incorrect treatment of the letter of comforts amounting to Rs 2654 crore, which should have been correctly treated as financial guarantees as per the accounting standards, the effect of which on profit/loss is not quantified.

The Audit Firm's EQC partner has failed to report material misstatements known to him to appear in a financial statement with which he is concerned in his professional capacity and has not exercised due diligence to obtain sufficient information to objectively evaluate the significant judgements of the Engagement Team and conclusions reached by them.

The Audit Firm has failed to maintain documents as per SA 230. The integrity of the Audit File is questionable due to tampering and inconsistency pointed out at several places in the AQRR.

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES