India, Kuwait emphasize Dialogue Over Conflict to Secure Energy and Trade Supplies (See 'Corp Brief') Misc - There is no right in borrower to personal hearing by banks before classifying their account as fraud account: SC (See 'Legal Desk') Manohar Lal holds Key Engagements on Infrastructure and Development Cooperation (See 'Corp Brief') CARI Bengaluru gets ISO 15189:2022 Accreditation in Biochemistry (See 'Corp Brief') NI Act – At stage of issuance of process, statutory presumption u/s 139 of NI Act cannot be dislodged in summary manner merely by contending that cheque issued was not for legally enforceable debt: SC (See 'Legal Desk') Barabanki to Bahraich Highway to become Key Cross-Border Trade Lifeline (See 'Corp Brief') Advanced Agriculture fest kicks off in Raisen in MP (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - Sec 2(1)(u) permits attachment of any property of equivalent value, including properties acquired prior to commission of scheduled offence, which are untraceable: SAFEMA (See 'Legal Desk') NTWB welcomes Jan Vishwas Amendments (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Controller of Patent would decide whether differences, viewed in knowledge of alleged invention, constitute steps which would have been obvious to ordinary person skilled in art and rule out hindsight approach: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Anand Kumar Pal joins MoF as Chief Cost Adviser (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Generic disclosure does not, by itself, defeat novelty of specific disclosure; Prior art that teaches away from claimed invention cannot serve as foundation for anticipation: HC (See 'Legal Desk') India-GCC reaffirms commitment to Regional Stability (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Prior user of trademark has superior rights over subsequent user who holds registration for same or similar mark: HC (See 'Legal Desk') India-Bahrain stresses stability, Supply Chain Resilience and Stronger Economic Ties (See 'Corp Brief') Company Law - Sourcing pre-condition deposit unlawfully from corporate funds in direct violation of Sec 185, or executing settlement agreements without effectuating actual refunds or delivering legally valid & habitable possession, is illegal: SC (See 'Legal Desk') Supreme Court Clears Path For Single Insolvency Proceedings Against Linked Group Companies (See CORP EINSICHT)

NFRA report finds fault with appointment of auditor for IL&FS

Published: Sep 24, 2021

By TIOLCorplaws News Service

NEW DELHI, SEPT 24, 2021: THE National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) has issued Audit Quality Review (AQR) report of the statutory audit of IL&FS Transportation Networks Limited (ITNL) for the Financial Year 2017-18.

The statutory auditor for this engagement was SRBC & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants.

The AQR has been conducted pursuant to Section 132(2)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013 and NFRA Rules, 2018 which require the NFRA to, inter alia, monitor and enforce the compliance with accounting standards and auditing standards India.

Some of the significant conclusions of NFRA in the report are as follows:

The initial appointment of SRBC & Co LLP, and the continuation of SRBC & Co LLP, as statutory auditor of ITNL, was prima facie illegal and void.

The Audit Firm has failed to appropriately and sufficiently evaluate the use of the going concern basis of accounting by the Management and has thus failed to note the implications thereof in the Auditor's Report.

ITNL's financial exposure to its subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures amounting to Rs. 3,346 crore was not properly valued as per the applicable Accounting Standards.

The Company's losses during 2017-18 were understated by at least Rs. 2021 crore on account of unjustified reversal of Expected Credit Loss (ECL) on loans given to the SPV and on trade receivables, and due to incorrect impairment valuation. This is excluding the impact due to incorrect treatment of the letter of comforts amounting to Rs 2654 crore, which should have been correctly treated as financial guarantees as per the accounting standards, the effect of which on profit/loss is not quantified.

The Audit Firm's EQC partner has failed to report material misstatements known to him to appear in a financial statement with which he is concerned in his professional capacity and has not exercised due diligence to obtain sufficient information to objectively evaluate the significant judgements of the Engagement Team and conclusions reached by them.

The Audit Firm has failed to maintain documents as per SA 230. The integrity of the Audit File is questionable due to tampering and inconsistency pointed out at several places in the AQRR.

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES