Access Control & AI-Enabled CCTV Systems to streamline Passenger Flow at Railway stations (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Order passed by Controller of Patents, which lacks independent analysis and is verbatim reproduction of submissions of one party or recommendations of Opposition Board, is procedurally flawed: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Gut Microbiota and Probiotic Science Foundation organises 16th India Probiotic Symposium (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Overall appearance at first impression is crucial to identify passing off, and meticulous side-by-side dissection is not necessary and trade dress has to be judged as whole: HC (See 'Legal Desk') DPIIT signs MoU with fuel-tech company to support startups (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Interim arrangement directing parties to maintain status quo, thereby preventing any alteration to nature of principal asset or creation of further third-party interests, should be continued until final disposal by NCLT: SC (See 'Legal Desk') National Council for Cement signs MoU to strengthen skill development (See 'Corp Brief') Misc - Non-public servant can be proceeded against when initial case is registered u/s 13 of PC Act by virtue of Section 107 of IPC: SC (See 'Legal Desk') India preparing for global role in shift towards 'greener' future: MoS (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Failure to exercise option of higher bid within prescribed timeline results in valid conclusion of auction in favour of highest bidder: NCLAT (See 'Legal Desk') Oriental Insurance crosses Rs 20,000 crore in Gross Premium (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Non-inclusion of claim in resolution plan results in its extinguishment, and any claim which is not expressly included in resolution plan, and which is not expressly barred as per such plan, cannot be inferred: SC (See 'Legal Desk') 10,000 contributors onboarded on Bhashini Samudaye (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - Recourse to LOC can be taken by investigating agency in cognizable offences if accused is deliberately evading arrest or not appearing in trial court despite Non-Bailable Warrants: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Supreme Court Clears Path For Single Insolvency Proceedings Against Linked Group Companies (See CORP EINSICHT)

NFRA report finds fault with appointment of auditor for IL&FS

Published: Sep 24, 2021

By TIOLCorplaws News Service

NEW DELHI, SEPT 24, 2021: THE National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) has issued Audit Quality Review (AQR) report of the statutory audit of IL&FS Transportation Networks Limited (ITNL) for the Financial Year 2017-18.

The statutory auditor for this engagement was SRBC & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants.

The AQR has been conducted pursuant to Section 132(2)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013 and NFRA Rules, 2018 which require the NFRA to, inter alia, monitor and enforce the compliance with accounting standards and auditing standards India.

Some of the significant conclusions of NFRA in the report are as follows:

The initial appointment of SRBC & Co LLP, and the continuation of SRBC & Co LLP, as statutory auditor of ITNL, was prima facie illegal and void.

The Audit Firm has failed to appropriately and sufficiently evaluate the use of the going concern basis of accounting by the Management and has thus failed to note the implications thereof in the Auditor's Report.

ITNL's financial exposure to its subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures amounting to Rs. 3,346 crore was not properly valued as per the applicable Accounting Standards.

The Company's losses during 2017-18 were understated by at least Rs. 2021 crore on account of unjustified reversal of Expected Credit Loss (ECL) on loans given to the SPV and on trade receivables, and due to incorrect impairment valuation. This is excluding the impact due to incorrect treatment of the letter of comforts amounting to Rs 2654 crore, which should have been correctly treated as financial guarantees as per the accounting standards, the effect of which on profit/loss is not quantified.

The Audit Firm's EQC partner has failed to report material misstatements known to him to appear in a financial statement with which he is concerned in his professional capacity and has not exercised due diligence to obtain sufficient information to objectively evaluate the significant judgements of the Engagement Team and conclusions reached by them.

The Audit Firm has failed to maintain documents as per SA 230. The integrity of the Audit File is questionable due to tampering and inconsistency pointed out at several places in the AQRR.

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES