MPEDA to organise Second National Seafood Skill Olympiad during Seafood Expo Bharat 2026 (See 'Corp Brief') India's Space and Biotechnology Sectors present new collaboration opportunities: MoS (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - After pronouncement of final judgment and decree under Order XX CPC, Court becomes functus officio and cannot grant liberty for post-decree impleadment of mirror/redirect/alphanumeric websites: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Office of Principal Scientific Adviser signs MoU with Data Security Council of India (See 'Corp Brief') Telangana strengthens Clean Cities Through Behaviour Change and Citizen Action (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - If essential and dominant feature of earlier mark is fully contained in later mark, and later mark is only pluralized form that conveys same meaning, later mark can be held deceptively similar: HC (See 'Legal Desk') JP Nadda To Release Guidelines For 'Anaemia Mukt Bharat Abhiyaan' Today (See 'Corp Brief') A&C - Restraint on alienation of assets cannot be imposed when such relief was neither specifically sought nor argued in Section 17 application: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Environment Minister inaugurates workshop on tiger reintroduction in Sariska (See 'Corp Brief') JP Nadda to unveil healthcare programme for children up to three years (See 'Corp Brief') A&C - Scope of scrutiny u/s 11 is confined to prima facie examination of existence of arbitration agreement & does not extend to adjudication of disputed questions of fact or law: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Dasheri, Chausa, Langra and Kesar showcase Rich Diversity of Indian Mangoes (See 'Corp Brief') FEMA - Statutory protection under Section 6(4) cannot be invoked to legitimise unexplained or inadequately accounted foreign exchange transactions: SAFEMA (See 'Legal Desk') Ease of Doing Business: Irritants eased out of FSSAI Licensing Regulations (See 'Corp Brief') SEBI - Failure to file Quarterly Activity Reports for multiple consecutive quarters constitutes violation of regulatory framework & attracts consequences prescribed under Regulation 35 of AIF Regulations, 2012: SEBI (See 'Legal Desk') AI, Nuclear, Space, Quantum tech to determine contours of future growth: MoS (See 'Corp Brief') SARFAESI - In absence of any adjudication by the DRT in determining the debt, statutory scheme permits reliance upon claim made by secured creditor for purpose of fixing pre-deposit: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Tech Innovation and disruption in Construction Industry (See 'CORP EINSICHT')

NFRA report finds fault with appointment of auditor for IL&FS

Published: Sep 24, 2021

By TIOLCorplaws News Service

NEW DELHI, SEPT 24, 2021: THE National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) has issued Audit Quality Review (AQR) report of the statutory audit of IL&FS Transportation Networks Limited (ITNL) for the Financial Year 2017-18.

The statutory auditor for this engagement was SRBC & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants.

The AQR has been conducted pursuant to Section 132(2)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013 and NFRA Rules, 2018 which require the NFRA to, inter alia, monitor and enforce the compliance with accounting standards and auditing standards India.

Some of the significant conclusions of NFRA in the report are as follows:

The initial appointment of SRBC & Co LLP, and the continuation of SRBC & Co LLP, as statutory auditor of ITNL, was prima facie illegal and void.

The Audit Firm has failed to appropriately and sufficiently evaluate the use of the going concern basis of accounting by the Management and has thus failed to note the implications thereof in the Auditor's Report.

ITNL's financial exposure to its subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures amounting to Rs. 3,346 crore was not properly valued as per the applicable Accounting Standards.

The Company's losses during 2017-18 were understated by at least Rs. 2021 crore on account of unjustified reversal of Expected Credit Loss (ECL) on loans given to the SPV and on trade receivables, and due to incorrect impairment valuation. This is excluding the impact due to incorrect treatment of the letter of comforts amounting to Rs 2654 crore, which should have been correctly treated as financial guarantees as per the accounting standards, the effect of which on profit/loss is not quantified.

The Audit Firm's EQC partner has failed to report material misstatements known to him to appear in a financial statement with which he is concerned in his professional capacity and has not exercised due diligence to obtain sufficient information to objectively evaluate the significant judgements of the Engagement Team and conclusions reached by them.

The Audit Firm has failed to maintain documents as per SA 230. The integrity of the Audit File is questionable due to tampering and inconsistency pointed out at several places in the AQRR.

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES