Consortium-Driven Innovation Model pioneered by IIT Madras enables immediate Commercialisation: MoS (See 'Corp Brief') NBA supports Conservation of Biological Resources (See 'Corp Brief') Cabinet approves Widening of National Highway-167 from Gudebellur to Mahabubnagar (See 'Corp Brief') Innovation and evidence are two pillars that will shape the next era of Unani medicine: MoS (See 'Corp Brief') A&C - Different interpretation of contract by in itself is no ground to interfere with arbitral award: SC (See 'Legal Desk') Cabinet approves upgradation of Dhamasiya-Bitada Sections of NH-56 to 4-Lane Standard (See 'Corp Brief') Govt launches 'PM RAHAT' - Cashless Treatment of Road Accident Victims (See 'Corp Brief') India achieves faster decline in under-5 Mortality Rate: Nadda (See 'Corp Brief') A&C - Non-issuance of a Sec 21 notice by one party is not fatal to raising claims before arbitral tribunal if disputes are otherwise covered by broadly worded arbitration clause: SC (See 'Legal Desk') Cabinet infuses Rs 10000 Crores for startups engaged in deep-tech, innovative manufacturing (See 'Corp Brief') Trade Marks - non-use of a mark filed on proposed-to-be-used basis is irrelevant for assessing registrability of the mark: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Minister proposes exploring solutions such as National Housing Exchange (See 'Corp Brief') IBC/RTI - appellant cannot seek disclosure of internal notings & replies under RTI Act when same issue has already been disposed of earlier: IBBI (See 'Legal Desk') In 2 yrs, India AI Mission has set up Foundation for Development of AI Ecosystem (See 'Corp Brief') A&C - Applications for extending arbitral tribunal's mandate u/s 29A(4) must be filed exclusively before principal civil court of original jurisdiction: SC (See 'Legal Desk') Govt approves wheat exports and allows additional wheat and sugar exports (See 'Corp Brief') A&C - Arbitral proceedings are set to commence on date of receipt of notice invoking arbitration clause: SC (See 'Legal Desk') Centre for Trade organises International Moot Court under WTO Chairs Program (See 'Corp Brief') A&C - Under pre-2015 amendment regime, once party consents to court order appointing arbitrator, they cannot subsequently challenge existence or validity of arbitration clause before arbitral tribunal: SC (See 'Legal Desk') The Securities Markets Code, 2025: Strengthened Enforcement, Weakened Accountability? (See 'CORP EINSICHT')

NFRA report finds fault with appointment of auditor for IL&FS

Published: Sep 24, 2021

By TIOLCorplaws News Service

NEW DELHI, SEPT 24, 2021: THE National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) has issued Audit Quality Review (AQR) report of the statutory audit of IL&FS Transportation Networks Limited (ITNL) for the Financial Year 2017-18.

The statutory auditor for this engagement was SRBC & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants.

The AQR has been conducted pursuant to Section 132(2)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013 and NFRA Rules, 2018 which require the NFRA to, inter alia, monitor and enforce the compliance with accounting standards and auditing standards India.

Some of the significant conclusions of NFRA in the report are as follows:

The initial appointment of SRBC & Co LLP, and the continuation of SRBC & Co LLP, as statutory auditor of ITNL, was prima facie illegal and void.

The Audit Firm has failed to appropriately and sufficiently evaluate the use of the going concern basis of accounting by the Management and has thus failed to note the implications thereof in the Auditor's Report.

ITNL's financial exposure to its subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures amounting to Rs. 3,346 crore was not properly valued as per the applicable Accounting Standards.

The Company's losses during 2017-18 were understated by at least Rs. 2021 crore on account of unjustified reversal of Expected Credit Loss (ECL) on loans given to the SPV and on trade receivables, and due to incorrect impairment valuation. This is excluding the impact due to incorrect treatment of the letter of comforts amounting to Rs 2654 crore, which should have been correctly treated as financial guarantees as per the accounting standards, the effect of which on profit/loss is not quantified.

The Audit Firm's EQC partner has failed to report material misstatements known to him to appear in a financial statement with which he is concerned in his professional capacity and has not exercised due diligence to obtain sufficient information to objectively evaluate the significant judgements of the Engagement Team and conclusions reached by them.

The Audit Firm has failed to maintain documents as per SA 230. The integrity of the Audit File is questionable due to tampering and inconsistency pointed out at several places in the AQRR.

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES