Ministry of Steel holds Interactive Session with Global Diplomats Ahead of 'Bharat Steel 2026' (See 'Corp Brief') Khadse announces unique nationwide ASMITA League to mark International Women's Day (See 'Corp Brief') IPR – Anti-dissection rule, which requires trademarks to be compared as whole, does not apply where part of mark is proven to be dominant feature: HC (See 'Legal Desk') India Summit 2026: Major AI Investment Commitments made (See 'Corp Brief') Joshi commends CWC's Contribution to India's Food Security (See 'Corp Brief') SEBI - Termination of a major acquisition agreement constituted a material event requiring clear & conspicuous disclosure under Regulation 30 of the LODR Regulations: SAT (See 'Legal Desk') India invites the world to study, innovate and grow together (See 'Corp Brief') SEBI - Investor decisions & share prices are significantly influenced by disclosures relating to acquisitions & corporate developments, ergo, failure to transparently disclose termination undermines market integrity: SAT (See 'Legal Desk') Controller General of Communication Accounts inaugurates North Zone Review Meeting (See 'Corp Brief') National Arogya Fair 2026 concludes in Shegaon (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - For purpose of passing-off claim, prior use of composite trademark is sufficient to establish prior use of its essential and source-identifying component: HC (See 'Legal Desk') APEDA organises Sikkim Organic Conclave-cum-International Buyer Seller Meet in Gangtok (See 'Corp Brief') 'Double Engine' Momentum Can Fast-Track Kerala's Progress: MoS (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Waiver of rights under contract such as debenture trust deed cannot be implied if agreement explicitly requires such waiver to be in writing: SC (See 'Legal Desk') IBC - Manner in which bank classifies loan as non-performing asset for accounting or provisioning purposes does not determine IBC, if debt was restructured and acknowledged in fresh agreements: SC (See 'Legal Desk') IBC - corporate restructuring under IBC must be prioritized over stalled and ineffective proceedings under Companies Act to protect public funds and larger economic interest: SC (See 'Legal Desk') IBC - NCLT can't Reject Sec 7 application citing corporate debtor's financial health, once twin requirements of debt & default are established: SC LB (See 'Legal Desk') IBC - Moratorium u/s 14 of IBC is intended to preserve debtor's estate from creditor actions aimed at debt recovery, but does not interdict sovereign proceedings in rem for attachment or confiscation under Benami Act: SC (See 'Legal Desk') Supreme Court Clears Path For Single Insolvency Proceedings Against Linked Group Companies (See CORP EINSICHT)

NFRA report finds fault with appointment of auditor for IL&FS

Published: Sep 24, 2021

By TIOLCorplaws News Service

NEW DELHI, SEPT 24, 2021: THE National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) has issued Audit Quality Review (AQR) report of the statutory audit of IL&FS Transportation Networks Limited (ITNL) for the Financial Year 2017-18.

The statutory auditor for this engagement was SRBC & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants.

The AQR has been conducted pursuant to Section 132(2)(b) of the Companies Act, 2013 and NFRA Rules, 2018 which require the NFRA to, inter alia, monitor and enforce the compliance with accounting standards and auditing standards India.

Some of the significant conclusions of NFRA in the report are as follows:

The initial appointment of SRBC & Co LLP, and the continuation of SRBC & Co LLP, as statutory auditor of ITNL, was prima facie illegal and void.

The Audit Firm has failed to appropriately and sufficiently evaluate the use of the going concern basis of accounting by the Management and has thus failed to note the implications thereof in the Auditor's Report.

ITNL's financial exposure to its subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures amounting to Rs. 3,346 crore was not properly valued as per the applicable Accounting Standards.

The Company's losses during 2017-18 were understated by at least Rs. 2021 crore on account of unjustified reversal of Expected Credit Loss (ECL) on loans given to the SPV and on trade receivables, and due to incorrect impairment valuation. This is excluding the impact due to incorrect treatment of the letter of comforts amounting to Rs 2654 crore, which should have been correctly treated as financial guarantees as per the accounting standards, the effect of which on profit/loss is not quantified.

The Audit Firm's EQC partner has failed to report material misstatements known to him to appear in a financial statement with which he is concerned in his professional capacity and has not exercised due diligence to obtain sufficient information to objectively evaluate the significant judgements of the Engagement Team and conclusions reached by them.

The Audit Firm has failed to maintain documents as per SA 230. The integrity of the Audit File is questionable due to tampering and inconsistency pointed out at several places in the AQRR.

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES