President's discretionary grant of Rs 62.4 lakh disbursed to meritorious EMRS Students (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Patents Act does not impose any bar on amendment of patent application or specification at appellate stage: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Mandaviya announces 'Youth Spiritual Summit' in Varanasi (See 'Corp Brief') Misc - Land Acquisition Collector can't be said to had tendered compensation to recorded owner of subject land, simply based on notice of award u/s 12(2) of LA Act, in absence of communication inviting landowners to receive compensation : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Gadkari lays foundation stone for 9 NH projects in Karnataka (See 'Corp Brief') A&C - Merely pointing to existence of arbitration clause, without invoking statutory remedy u/s 8, is insufficient to seek dismissal of plaint on grounds of lack of jurisdiction: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Coal India's First Fully Women-Operated Dispensary Inaugurated at SECL (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - 'PLUTO' remains dominant part of both marks; Minor differences in presentation or added descriptors do not mitigate risk of confusion among consumers: HC (See 'Legal Desk') IPR - Rejection of patent application on blatantly illogical and misconceived reasoning, namely that invention was 'too simple' to qualify as patentable, was not justified: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Fifth Edition of National Startup Awards invites nominations (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - If goods of Petitioner are actually and in fact identified as 'PISCO', then GI PISCO would legitimately apply to such goods, as per Section 2(1)(e) of GI Act: HC (See 'Legal Desk') DoT rolls out Sanchar Mitra Scheme nationwide to empower Youth (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Writ Court is yet to decide plea of Lenskart as to no intention to infringe in using Titan's trademark on websites: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Meity launches Whitepaper on Quantum-Safe Cybersecurity (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Registrar of Trademarks must give reasoned order for pre-acceptance advertisement: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Quality Control Order on Steel Products: Exemptions given to dispatched consignments (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Courts can't decline protection to plaintiff on sole ground that subject matter of passing off action happens to be registered design: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Semicon India 2025: 300 companies from 18 countries to participate (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Copyright infringement by rogue websites who were using modern technology to hide their identities while unlawfully benefiting from JioStar's copyrighted works, calls for dynamic injunction: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Science & Technology is key growth engine for India's Economic Rise: MoS (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Registrar of Trade Marks need to consider factors mentioned u/s 11(6) of Trade Marks, while deciding whether mark is known or recognized in relevant section of public: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Why Family Businesses in India Are Losing Their Own Bloodline (See CORP EINSICHT)

CCI imposes penalty on maritime transport companies

Published: Jan 24, 2022

By TIOLCorplaws News Service

NEW DELHI, JAN 24, 2022: THE  Competition Commission of India ('CCI') passed a final order against four maritime transport companies namely Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha ('NYK Line'), Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd. ('K-Line'), Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd. ('MOL') and Nissan Motor Car Carrier Company ('NMCC') for indulging in cartelisation in the provision of maritime motor vehicle transport services to automobile Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) for various trade routes. Amongst these four companies, NYK Line, MOL and NMCC were lesser penalty applicants before CCI.  

The evaluation of available evidence revealed that there was an agreement between NYK Line, K-Line, MOL and NMCC with the objective of enforcement of “Respect Rule”, which implied avoiding competition with each other and protecting the business of incumbent carrier with the respective OEM. To achieve the said objective, the maritime transport companies resorted to multi-lateral as well as bilateral contacts/ meetings/ e-mails with each other to share commercially sensitive information which, inter alia, included freight rates. They also aimed to preserve their position in the market and maintain or increase prices, including by resisting requests for price reduction from certain OEMs. 

Accordingly, based on a cumulative assessment of the evidence, the Commission held all the four opposite parties, i.e., NYK Line, K-Line, MOL and NMCC, guilty of contravention of the provisions of Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002 (the Act), which prohibits anti-competitive agreements including cartels, from 2009 to 2012. Further, 14 individuals of NYK Line, 10 individuals of K-Line, 6 individuals of MOL and 3 individuals of NMCC, were also held liable for the anti-competitive conduct of their respective companies, in terms of the provisions of Section 48 of the Act. 

As three companies filed lesser penalty applications, the Commission gave benefit of reduction in penalty by 100% to NYK Line and its individuals, 50% to MOL and its individuals and 30% to NMCC and its individuals. Accordingly, the Commission directed K-Line, MOL and NMCC to pay penalties to the tune of approx. INR 24.23 crores, INR 10.12 crores and INR 28.69 crores respectively, besides passing a cease-and-desist order.

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES