DPIIT, Primus Partners Pvt. Ltd. ink MoU to bolster startup ecosystem (See 'Corp Brief') PBPT Act - a land sale is indeed a benami transaction, where payment is made by beneficial owner for future benefit of her family, while land is registered in name of somebody else: SAFEMA Tribunal (See 'Legal Desk') DPIIT, Kotak Mahindra Bank ink MoU to enhance financial & non-financial support for startups (See 'Corp Brief') IBC/RTI - CPIO not required to generate, interpret, or explain records; appeal against FAA's order is not tenable where all relevant information is provided: IBBI (See 'Legal Desk') Centre plans inspection drives and field verification to ensure compliance (See 'Corp Brief') India continues to rank 3rd in Annual Forest Gain (See 'Corp Brief') RERA - Promoters are mandatorily required to comply with statutory condition of pre-deposit u/s 43(5) of Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 before appeal can be entertained: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Government intervention and Corporate governance (See CORP EINSICHT) Prof Sood launched 'AI Playbooks for Agriculture and SMEs' (See 'Corp Brief') SARFAESI - Once scheme of arrangement is sanctioned in particular manner and is acted upon, it is no longer permissible for secured creditor to resile therefrom unilaterally: HC (See 'Legal Desk') CCI nod to Setu AIF Trust to acquire stakes in Edelweiss Asset & Edelweiss Trusteeship (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Mere adoption of product-by-process format would not result in novel product being downgraded to Section 48(b) of Patent Act: HC (See 'Legal Desk') CSIR hosts Capacity Building Workshop for Dissemination of Indian Knowledge System (See 'Corp Brief') Competition Act - issues pertaining to unauthorized business operations, public health & regulatory violations, not demonstrating any anti-competitive agreement or concerted action u/s 3 of the Act, cannot be looked into by CCI: CCI (See 'Legal Desk') 12 lakh Railway Employees working Day and Night during Festive Season: Vaishnaw (See 'Corp Brief') A&C - Restrictions contained in Code of Civil Procedure apply even in cases relating to enforcement of foreign arbitral awards: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Ministry of Mines introduces Timelines to Fast-track Operationalisation of Auctioned Blocks (See 'Corp Brief') RTI/IBC - Mechanism of the RTI Act cannot be commandeered for grievance redressal, policy suggestions, or compelling interpretations of prior responses: IBBI (See 'Legal Desk') Supreme Court Restores JSW's Resolution Plan in Bhushan Power Case: A Pragmatic Turn in IBC Jurisprudence (See CORP EINSICHT ) BSNL turns profitable after 18 Years: Scindia (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Withdrawal of CIRP cannot be permitted merely on the basis of a unilateral settlement with one minor creditor, particularly when other bigger Financial Creditors oppose it: NCLT (See 'Legal Desk') Chouhan to meet Ministers of 11 Ministries for 'Pradhan Mantri Dhan-Dhaanya Krishi Yojana' (See 'Corp Brief') SEBI - PayTM founder held guilty of circumventing SEBI regulations to unlawfully grant ESOPs to self and brother by mis-representing promoter status and control - contravened disclosure & eligibility norms of SEBI - barred from accepting ESOPs for three-year period: SEBI (See 'Legal Desk') NITI Aayog's Women Entrepreneurship Platform and DP World launch 'We Rise' initiative (See 'Corp Brief') A&C - Mere pendency of formal signature by one party, when other party has signed agreement after reading its terms including arbitration clause, does not prevent parties from being referred to arbitration: HC (See 'Legal Desk') MoS unveils Curtain Raiser for 4-day India International Science Festival (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - Secured creditor such as finance company not left without remedy, where properties acquired even prior to scheduled offence period are attached as value equivalent: SAFEMA Tribunal (See 'Legal Desk')

Amalgamations of Foreign Companies with Indian situs - Foreign Shareholders' tax exemption in India

Published: Sep 13, 2021

By Shankar Iyer, Direct Tax Leader, DAA Consulting

AMALGAMATION in India would mean a scheme whereby one company (amalgamating company) merges itself into another company (amalgamated company) and thereby forfeits its independent existence. Shareholders in amalgamating company effectively transfer the shareholding therein in lieu of shares in amalgamated company.

Exemption for shareholders of amalgamating company w.r.t transfer of shares therein pursuant to amalgamation with amalgamated Indian company

Under Indian tax law, an amalgamation is tax neutral so long as it satisfies certain conditions, such as, transfer of all property and liabilities of A Co to B Co, at least 75% (in value) shareholders of A Co becoming shareholders in B Co by virtue of amalgamation, etc. ('amalgamation test'). We assume amalgamation test would be satisfied and hence aforementioned amalgamation is tax neutral under Indian tax law.

Further, as illustrated in Case I, transfer of shares in A Co by shareholders of A Co in lieu of shares in B Co, as part of such amalgamation, is specifically exempt in India from any incidence of capital gains in their hands so long as the amalgamated company (i.e. B Co) is an Indian company. Thus, shareholders of A Co, whether Indian or foreign, enjoy an exemption from capital gains in India w.r.t transfer of their shareholding in A Co in lieu of shares in B Co upon such amalgamation, so long as B Co is an Indian company.

Shares of a foreign company 'deemed to be located in India' and exemption from tax for transfer of such deemed Indian shareholding pursuant to amalgamation

Under Indian tax law, shares of a foreign company, say F Co, shall be deemed to be situated in India if such share derives value (directly or indirectly) substantially from assets located in India - Indian Asset Test:

a. Fair market value ('FMV') of such gross assets i.e. without reduction of any corresponding liability in respect thereof, whether tangible or intangible, in India must exceed a threshold limit of c. USD 1.50 mn and

b. represent at least 50% of value of all assets owned by F Co.

Accordingly, transfer of such shares of F Co in whatsoever manner would be taxable in India unless specifically exempt. Further, for such foreign amalgamations, the Indian tax law provides for an exemption qua transfer of shares in F Co if they meet the aforementioned amalgamation test under the Indian tax law. We assume that the amalgamation test would be met in the case of amalgamation of Y Co with Z Co illustrated below.

Note: In Case II, shares of Y Co can also be deemed to be located in India if it satisfies the Indian Asset Test i.e. derives value significantly from shares of F Co which in turn derives such value from I Co. In that situation, even amalgamation of Y Co into Z Co would need to be analysed from an Indian tax angle vis-à-vis shareholders of Y Co.

Transfer of 'deemed Indian shareholding' by amalgamating foreign company pursuant to amalgamation is exempt from tax. However, whether shareholders in such amalgamating foreign company would also be exempt from tax in India per Case I?

In Case I, we observe that shareholders, whether Indian or foreign, of an amalgamating company enjoy an exemption from tax in India w.r.t transfer of shares therein pursuant to an amalgamation with an amalgamated Indian company.

However, there is no such exemption provided under Indian tax law to shareholders of amalgamating company where the amalgamated company is a foreign company. Case II would envisage that situation whereby,

a) shares in Y Co may also be deemed to be located in India as per Indian Asset Test, but

b) shareholders in Y Co may not have any specific exemption under Indian tax law w.r.t transfer of shares therein pursuant to an amalgamation of Y Co into Z Co, a foreign company.

This would naturally lead to a CASE III conundrum for shareholders of Y Co as below:

Accordingly, under Indian tax law, while there may be an exemption for Y Co w.r.t transfer of its deemed Indian shareholding in F Co to Z Co pursuant to amalgamation, shareholders of Y Co may not be exempt from capital gains arising in India due to transfer of shares therein in lieu of shares in Z Co as part of said amalgamation. Accordingly, shareholders of Y Co would be subject to capital gains taxation in India.

Ideally, considering such exemption exists in Indian tax law for shareholders of amalgamating company only when the amalgamated company is an Indian company, on the basis of non-discrimination, the Indian tax law ought to be amended in order to specifically provide for such an exemption to shareholders of amalgamating company even when the amalgamated company is a foreign company. This becomes even more relevant when in case of shares of a foreign company that are deemed to be located in India, specific exemptions are provided w.r.t transfer of shares therein vide foreign amalgamation.

One may need to factor these aspects under Indian tax law as part of global restructuring exercises involving Indian assets.

[The views expressed are strictly personal.]

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES