| 2020-TIOLCORP-34-SC-MISC-LB
Hindustan Unilever Ltd Vs State Of Madhya Pradesh
Whether in the absence of the Company, the Nominated officer cannot be convicted - YES : SC
Whether order of remand to the trial court to fill up the lacuna is not a fair option due to failure of the trial court to convict the Company renders the entire conviction of the Nominated Person as unsustainable - YES : SC
- Appeal allowed: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
2020-TIOLCORP-33-SC-MISC-LB
C Bright Vs District Collector
Whether time limit provided u/s 14 of SARFAESI Act for District Magistrates to deliver possession of secured asset is not mandatory - YES : SC
Whether remedy u/s 14 of SARFAESI Act is not rendered redundant if the District Magistrate is unable to handover the possession as District Magistrate would still be enjoin upon, the duty to facilitate delivery of possession at earliest - YES : SC
- Appeal dismissed: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
2020-TIOLCORP-152-HC-DEL-MISC
Relaxo Footwears Ltd Vs XS Brands Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Whethera party is not liable to be sued for infringement of a trademark if it only endorsesa brand with no ownership interest in it– YES: HC.
Whether an order passed on the basis of submission made in the Court can be reviewed if the submission was found to be possibly malafide at a later stage during the pendency of proceedings – YES: HC
- Case disposed: DELHI HIGH COURT | 
