2017-TIOLCORP-29-HC-DEL-MISC
Ntt Docomo Inc Vs Tata Sons Ltd
Whether merely because RBI's power and jurisdiction are discussed in an Arbitration Award or petition before a Court will it authorize RBI to intervene in such proceedings - NO : HC
Whether RBI would necessarily be required to be heard in proceedings for enforcement of an arbitral award merely because it entails remitting money to to a non-Indian entity outside India, or to an account of a party outside India - NO: HC
Whether any special permission of RBI would be required for remission of the amount of damages awarded to a non-resident entity in terms of an arbitral award - NO: HC
Whether a shareholder agreement involving non-resident parties can be said to be in violation of FEMA 20 Regulations when FEMA contains no absolute prohibition on contractual obligations and such agreement was legally capable of being performed without obtaining the special permission of RBI - NO: HC
Whether a shareholder agreement is valid, in terms of FEMA 20 Regulations, if it provides for downside protection and not an assured return on investment and FEMA contains no absolute prohibition on such contractual obligations - YES : HC
Whether consent terms entered into between the parties can be said to be valid if the parties have undertaken to abide by the directions of the court & obtain all requisite statutory permissions and there is nothing in the consent terms that is contrary to any provision of Indian Law or public policy - YES: HC
Whether an Award can enter into a settlement even at the stage of execution of the decree or Award - YES : HC
- Case disposed of: DELHI HIGH COURT