SAFEMA - Appellant have furnished evidence which show satisfactorily that they took all reasonable steps to realise export proceeds : Tribunal (See 'Legal Desk') Companies Act - Winding up petition can be dismissed when contentions raised by parties constitute triable issues as Company Court cannot enter into adjudication of disputed facts of amount due and payable : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Competition Act - In absence of any apparent anti-competitive conduct, decision of purchase or sale of product and quantity thereof is driven by commercial considerations of market players : CCI (See 'Legal Desk') Principal Scientific Adviser chairs meeting to discuss Biomass Cultivation (See 'Corp Brief') India Pavilion at World Hydrogen Summit showcases Green Hydrogen Mission (See 'Corp Brief') Slum Rehabilitation Act - Preferential right to owner is available only when someone other than owner is being preferred and owner has never before been given or availed of right to develop : HC (See 'Legal Desk') CPC - Application can be dismissed as Intervener has already initiated its own remedy by way of independent Execution Petition : HC (See 'Legal Desk') SEBI Act - Appellant has not shown sufficient cause for condonation of delay in filing appeal : SAT (See 'Legal Desk') PMLA - When questions relating to legality of arrest is under consideration, more holistic and libertarian view is to release Chief Minister of Delhi on interim bail for Lok Sabha General Elections : SC (See 'Legal Desk') Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 - Order for forfeiture of properties is rightly made as property is occupied through lllegal earning : Tribunal (See 'Legal Desk') Arbitration Act - As petitioner is not notified as 'financial institution' or 'bank' under RDB Act, there is no bar on parallel proceedings to co-exist under A&C Act as well as SARFAESI Act : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Cr.P.C. - Once order issuing process has been set aside, then applicant has no right to file application u/s 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashment of complaint case : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Summer Power demand expected to be adequately met during both day and night (See 'Corp Brief') Competition Act - WordPress.org is justified in taking appropriate action against any developer found non-compliant with prescribed standards and regulations : CCI (See 'Legal Desk') Ministry of Skill signs MoU with Mahindra Ltd to conduct two Pilot Projects (See 'Corp Brief') SEBI Act - Operation of order can be stayed for appellant as he has resigned and has no role to play in decisions made thereafter for continuation of schemes : SAT (See 'Legal Desk') IREDA Global Green Energy Finance IFSC Limited incorporated in GIFT City (See 'Corp Brief') Trade Marks Act - Petitioner has no locus to challenge order as petitioner is not claiming itself to be manufactory in Madhya Pradesh and registration of its label under M.P. Beer & Wine Rules : HC (See 'Legal Desk') SARFAESI Act - Discretion to grant reduction in pre-deposit rests with DRAT and Petitioner has failed to make out any ground for interference : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Constitution of India - Petitioner is entitled for Capital subsidy : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Coast Guard inks MoU with Jindal Steel for boosting indigenous manufacturing capacity (See 'Corp Brief') Companies Act - Winding up proceedings pending before High Courts, which are at nascent stage and have not progressed to advanced stage, can be transferred to NCLT : HC (See 'Legal Desk') PMLA - Considering involvement of applicant in selling fake Remdesivir injection at higher price, applicant is not entitled for anticipatory bail : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Arbitration Act - Any amicable settlement not incompatible with arbitration agreement is encouraged by Arbitral Tribunal : HC (See 'Legal Desk') M.P. Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 - Order passed by respondents is devoid of merit as land of petitioner is left open for purpose of any future road expansion : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Arbitration Act - Since appellant has failed to establish loss suffered, Arbitral Tribunal rightly rejected appellant's claim in this regard : HC (See 'Legal Desk') PMLA - Arrest order and consequent remand order are not illegal : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Keel-laying ceremony performed at Goa Shipyard (See 'Corp Brief') Companies Act - Winding up proceedings pending before High Courts, which are at nascent stage and have not progressed to advanced stage, can be transferred to NCLT : HC (See 'Legal Desk') SEBI Act - Extension of time can be allowed to SEBI to complete investigation : SAT (See 'Legal Desk') Arbitration Act - Respondent no.3 is not liable for repayment obligations of financial facilities extended by appellant to respondent no 1 company : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Mineral production grows by 8 percent in February (See 'Corp Brief') SARFAESI Act - Court refrains to adjudicate matter on merits when matter is already pending in DRAT : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Coal production in April up by 7.4% (See 'Corp Brief') SEBI Act - Appellants have made case for stay as rigours of directions of SEBI order would adversely affect business of Appellant as well as their clients : SAT (See 'Legal Desk') Trade Mark Act - Marks 'BETSONE' and 'BETASON' are deceptively similar to registered trademark 'BETNESOL' and visually, phonetically and structurally alike, with minimal alterations : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Voting by tribal communities blossoms as ECI's outreach to them bears fruit (See 'Corp Brief') SARFAESI Act - No fault can be found with respondent financial institution invoking Section 14 of SARFAESI Act by approaching District Magistrate, Rewa : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs observes Swachhata Pakhwada (See 'Corp Brief')

CCI okays acquisition of Metso Oyj's mineral business

Published: Sep 05, 2020

By TIOLCORPLAWS News Service

NEW DELHI, SEPT 05, 2020: THE Competition Commission of India (CCI) approved the acquisition of Metso Oyj's (“Metso”) minerals business by Outotec Oyj (“Outotec”) under Section 31(1) of the Competition Act, 2002, [Combination Registration No. C-2020/03/735].

The CCI has published the order approving the acquisition of Metso's minerals business (“Metso Minerals”) by Outotec. All such assets, rights, debts, and liabilities of Metso that relate to, or primarily serve, its minerals business (comprising the mining, aggregates, minerals consumables, minerals services, pumps, and recycling businesses) will be acquired by Outotec. The approval is subject to modifications that are aimed at eliminating the likely anti-competitive effects of the proposed combination.

The above order was a result of an detailed inquiry undertaken pursuant to the notice given by Metso and Outotec under sub-section (2) of Section 6 of the Competition Act, 2002 (Act) on 12 th   March, 2020. The Commission found that the Proposed Combination is an integration of two strong and close competitors in the market for Iron Ore Palletisation (IOP) Equipment Island in India and appears to:

  1. limit the number of suppliers available to customer in this market in India;
  2. reduce the intensity of innovation in the technology for pelletizing technology and equipment;
  3. perpetuate the substantial market position of the Parties in the market; and reduce or eliminate the competitive pressure that would prevail in the absence of Proposed Combination;
  4. reduce the extent of countervailing bargaining power that the customers enjoy on account of the competition exerted by independent presence of Metso and Outotec;
  5. increase the cost of the entrants and rivals to compete and increase their presence in the market given that there is no likeliness of a timely and sufficient entry that could act as a competitive constraint to the combined entity; result in creation of a strong integrated player

Thus, the CCI was of the view that the proposed combination would reduce competition and confer the combined entity, the ability to increase price etc.

In order to address the competition concerns arising as a result of the proposed combination, the Parties proposed voluntary remedies / modifications (VRP). The Commission noted that VRP given by Parties eliminates the overlap between the Parties in the IOP segment in India and would effectively transfer Metso Minerals's Indian Straight Grate (SG) IOP capital equipment business to a suitable buyer, thereby preserving the competition.

The modification essentially involves transferring a right to fully use and exploit the SG IOP capital equipment drawings, including the related registered IP by way of an exclusive and irrevocable license, subject to a lump sum upfront payment and no ongoing royalties. VRP will allow the emergence of a new competitor, thus resolving any concerns whatsoever in relation to this segment.

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES