DRDO hands over first batch of Airbrake Control Module for LCA Tejas Mk1A (See 'Corp Brief') Companies Act - Charges of professional misconduct in SCN are proved for which monetary penalty can be imposed : NFRA (See 'Legal Desk') PMLA - Application for anticipatory bail can be rejected as there is failure on part of applicant to appear before trial Court despite service of bailable warrant : HC (See 'Legal Desk') IBC - There is no scope of interference in writ petition since there is no arbitrariness, mala fides or palpably illegality in impugned order : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Trade Marks Act - Issue of grant of registration can be remitted back to Examiner as trade mark could not be rejected and is required to be advertised : HC (See 'Legal Desk') LODR Regulations - Stay can be granted on effect and operation of order pending disposal of appeal on condition that Appellant deposits 50% of interest amount determined to be payable to CUHL : SAT (See 'Legal Desk') SARFAESI Act - If any borrower is aggrieved by action of private bank/ARC, then borrower has to avail remedy under SARFAESI Act and no writ petition can lie or is maintainable : HC (See 'Legal Desk') CCI approves acquisition of stake in PAMP Technologies by PAMP Ventures SA (See 'Corp Brief') SARFAESI Act - Due to failure to repay outstanding amount despite interim order, present petition is dismissed : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Limitation Act - Sec 14 of Limitation Act is wide in its application, inasmuch as it is not confined in its applicability only to cases of defect of jurisdiction but applicable also to cases where prior proceedings have failed on account of other cause : HC (See 'Legal Desk') IBC - Application is deemed to be withdrawn as it is filed at time when amendments came into force and it is incumbent upon FC to comply with newly enforced statutory requirements : NCLT (See 'Legal Desk') Indian Economic Service calls on President Murmu (See 'Corp Brief') Companies Act - ROC's decision of rejecting application for conversion is not contrary to legislative intent of Section 18 : HC (See 'Legal Desk') PMLA - If criminal case against person is quashed then there can be no offence of money laundering against him : HC (See 'Legal Desk') SEBI Act - Violation of various SEBI circulars by noticee stands established for which penalty can be imposed : SEBI (See 'Legal Desk') Ambuja Cements signs agreement to acquire 1.5 MTPA Grinding Unit at Tuticorin (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - Any person aggrieved by order, even if person is not party to order, can file appeal u/s 26 of PMLA, 2002 before Appellate Tribunal : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Copyright Act - Trustee only owe fiduciary duty to beneficiary with regards to trust property and Registrar of Copyright to rectify Register in that registration shall be in name of Trust : HC (See 'Legal Desk') SEBI Act - Though broker has failed to be vigilant in securities market by allowing and facilitating non-genuine transactions but has not personally gained from transactions : SAT (See 'Legal Desk') IREDA celebrates legacy: Past leaders share Vision for Future (See 'Corp Brief') SARFAESI Act - Confirmed auction sale can be interfered by High Court by entertaining writ petition only when there is fraud/collusion and present case is not case of fraud or collusion : SC (See 'Legal Desk')

Calls to rival networks; Jio to charge @ Rs 6 paise/min

Published: Oct 09, 2019

By TIOLCORPLAWS News Service

NEW DELHI, OCT 09, 2019: RELIANCE Jio, owned by the billionaire Mukesh Ambani has issued a statement today that from now on till such time that TRAI moves to Zero termination of IUC charge regime, the company will charge its customers 6 paise per minute for voice calls made to rival phone networks. To cushion the stance, it was also announced that it will compensate its customers by giving free data of equal value.

Jio cited traffic asymmetry as the cause of such decision where it continued to pay IUC from its own resources to Airtel and Vodafone-Idea et al while offering free voice to its customers despite the repeated stance of TRAI and the amendment already made to the regulations to reduce the IUC to Zero. So far, in the last three years Jio has paid nearly Rs.13,500 crore as NET IUC charges to the other operators.

Interconnect Usage Charge or IUC is a cost paid by one mobile telecom operator to another, when its customers make outgoing mobile calls to the other operator’s customers. These calls between two different networks are known as mobile off-net calls. IUC charges are fixed by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) and are currently at 6 paise per minute.

In an affidavit dated October 29, 2011, TRAI has affirmed its stance towards bringing the IUC charges to zero before the Supreme Court by submitting that the TRAI is of the opinion that there should be progressive reduction in termination charges finally converging to zero termination charge at the end of 2 years from the present. Though the time period to do so was by 2014, at that time neither 4G nor Jio existed. However, after a comprehensive review of the IUC regime through a transparent and elaborate consultation process in 2016, TRAI issued the Telecommunication Interconnection Usage Charges (Thirteenth Amendment) Regulations, 2017 which was placed before the Parliament. The effect of amendment was to reduce IUC for mobile calls from 14 paise/ minute to 6 paise/minute from October 01, 2017 and then reducing the IUC charges to zero from January 01, 2020.

The Reliance Jio statement further lamented that even after the TRAI stance, while the incumbent operators reduced voice tariffs for their 4G customers, they continued to charge exorbitant tariffs to their 35 - 40 crore 2G customers, and in fact increased the tariffs for voice calls to around Rs. 1.50/ minute. The price differential of free voice on Jio network and exorbitantly high tariffs on 2G networks caused the 35 - 40 crore 2G customers of Airtel and Vodafone-Idea to give missed calls to Jio customers. This subsequently converted into a huge missed call phenomena where the incoming calls to Jio was converted into outgoing calls from Jio to other operators. Since the rival networds kept their 2G voice tariffs high, this led to asymmetric of the off-net voice traffic which was earlier symmetrical for Jio.

Citing such traffic asymmetry as the only ground in the recently floated consultation paper, TRAI had reopened the closed chapter on IUC, which has already been made zero with effect from January 01, 2020 by amendment to IUC Regulations. In this background the consultation paper had created Regulatory uncertainty. This uncertainty was cited by Jio as the compelling factor to 'reluctantly and unavoidably' make a move to recover regulatory charge of 6 paise per minute for all off-net mobile voice calls so long as IUC charges exist.

Nevertheless, Jio has ensured that it stands firm on its commitment to offer the highest value to its customers, and there is no 6 paise per minute charge on:
++ all Jio to Jio calls;
++ all incoming calls;
++ Jio to landline calls; and
++ calls made using WhatsApp or FaceTime and similar platforms.

In addition to this, Jio obliges to provide additional data entitlement of equivalent value based on IUC top-up voucher consumption where the end result is touted as no increase in tariff for customers

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES