PSB Confluence 2026 - deposit mobilisation, banking for youth & investment cycles on agenda (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Only crystallised claims as on effective date are payable on pro-rata basis from designated Operational Creditors Settlement Amount: SC (See 'Legal Desk') RDDBFI - Borrowers cannot cherry-pick figures from bank certificates while ignoring standard accounting treatment of interest after NPA classification: SC (See 'Legal Desk') IPR - Holding subsequent trademark registration does not override prior court injunction protecting visual get-up: HC (See 'Legal Desk') A&C - Continuation of arbitration proceedings against some guarantors while statutory interim moratorium u/s 96 of IBC is in effect regarding 'debt' violates fundamental policy of Indian law: HC (See 'Legal Desk') IBC - Rights issue that does not comply with the mandatory timing and procedural requirements under company law, and which reduces majority shareholders into minority and transfers control, constitutes oppression: NCLT (See 'Legal Desk') DFS highlights mechanism for Timely Redressal of Insurance Policyholders' Grievances (See 'Corp Brief') CCRAS-NIIMH signs MoU with Sevadhi Museum and Indological Research Institute for Digitization (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Second proviso to Rule 30(9) of Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014, acts as mandatory statutory bar, which prevents Regional Director from allowing shifting of registered office while appeal against resolution plan is pending: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Over 2 Lakh Villages, Now 'Har Ghar Jal' Certified (See 'Corp Brief') Companies Act - Assets of a company belong to the entity and its creditors, not its shareholders; transfer of company assets seemingly to place them beyond creditors' reach is impermissible: HC (See 'Legal Desk') MSDE convenes India-Japan Stakeholder Consultation to strengthen skilling (See 'Corp Brief') Competition law - Dealership termination, even if commercially harsh, does not by itself become competition law violation unless there is material showing an anti-competitive agreement causing dominance and abuse: CCI (See 'Legal Desk') Naidu flags off Tiranga Rally under Har Ghar Tiranga Campaign 2026 (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - EPC contract cannot be said to be frustrated by efflux of time merely because works have been suspended due to non-payment: SC (See 'Legal Desk') Capital Market - Trading while in possession of Unpublished Price Sensitive Information automatically triggers insider trading liability: SC (See 'Legal Desk') States recognised for Strong Performance in Anemia Mukt Bharat Abhiyaan (See 'Corp Brief') Misc - Winding-up proceeding and civil suit for recovery of money are distinct and independent remedies, and initiation of one does not impact limitation for other: SC (See 'Legal Desk') Patents - Invoking common general knowledge as basis for rejecting patent application without identifying & substantiating source of such knowledge is impermissible in a quasi-judicial order u/s 15 of the Act: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Gaj Gaurav Awards 2026 conferred for Exemplary Contributions to Elephant Conservation (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - In infringement action u/s 29(2)(b) of Trade Marks Act, where marks are similar but not identical, burden lies strictly on plaintiff to establish that similarity is likely to cause confusion: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Competition - Business model of online food delivery inherently differs from direct restaurant sales - price differential between two does not per se establish abusive conduct per the Competition Act: CCI (See 'Legal Desk') Partnership to Enable Voice-First, Multilingual AI for Citizen-Centric Governance (See 'Corp Brief') Union Minister of Textiles inaugurates IIHT SUTRA 2026 (See 'Corp Brief') CPC - Injunction granted in respect of certain clothing brands which their owner explicitly admitted to being deceptively similar to existing brands & where defendent attempts to skirt its contractual obligations with the plaintiff by making microscopic variations in its brand: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Over 50,000 saplings planted Across 31 States on Hariyali Amavasya (See 'Corp Brief') FEMA - Appellants contravened provisions by failing to realise & repatriate export proceeds within prescribed period - penalties on directors upheld: SAFEMA (See 'Legal Desk') India reaffirms Commitment to Elephant Conservation on World Elephant Day 2026 (See 'Corp Brief') Competition Act - High win rate by itself, unsupported by evidence of coordinated bidding, bid rotation, or anti-competitive agreements, does not establish bid rigging u/s 3(3)(d) of the Act: CCI (See 'Legal Desk') Tete-a-tete around AI in banking sector often begins with algorithms (See CORP EINSICHT)

Calls to rival networks; Jio to charge @ Rs 6 paise/min

Published: Oct 09, 2019

By TIOLCORPLAWS News Service

NEW DELHI, OCT 09, 2019: RELIANCE Jio, owned by the billionaire Mukesh Ambani has issued a statement today that from now on till such time that TRAI moves to Zero termination of IUC charge regime, the company will charge its customers 6 paise per minute for voice calls made to rival phone networks. To cushion the stance, it was also announced that it will compensate its customers by giving free data of equal value.

Jio cited traffic asymmetry as the cause of such decision where it continued to pay IUC from its own resources to Airtel and Vodafone-Idea et al while offering free voice to its customers despite the repeated stance of TRAI and the amendment already made to the regulations to reduce the IUC to Zero. So far, in the last three years Jio has paid nearly Rs.13,500 crore as NET IUC charges to the other operators.

Interconnect Usage Charge or IUC is a cost paid by one mobile telecom operator to another, when its customers make outgoing mobile calls to the other operator’s customers. These calls between two different networks are known as mobile off-net calls. IUC charges are fixed by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) and are currently at 6 paise per minute.

In an affidavit dated October 29, 2011, TRAI has affirmed its stance towards bringing the IUC charges to zero before the Supreme Court by submitting that the TRAI is of the opinion that there should be progressive reduction in termination charges finally converging to zero termination charge at the end of 2 years from the present. Though the time period to do so was by 2014, at that time neither 4G nor Jio existed. However, after a comprehensive review of the IUC regime through a transparent and elaborate consultation process in 2016, TRAI issued the Telecommunication Interconnection Usage Charges (Thirteenth Amendment) Regulations, 2017 which was placed before the Parliament. The effect of amendment was to reduce IUC for mobile calls from 14 paise/ minute to 6 paise/minute from October 01, 2017 and then reducing the IUC charges to zero from January 01, 2020.

The Reliance Jio statement further lamented that even after the TRAI stance, while the incumbent operators reduced voice tariffs for their 4G customers, they continued to charge exorbitant tariffs to their 35 - 40 crore 2G customers, and in fact increased the tariffs for voice calls to around Rs. 1.50/ minute. The price differential of free voice on Jio network and exorbitantly high tariffs on 2G networks caused the 35 - 40 crore 2G customers of Airtel and Vodafone-Idea to give missed calls to Jio customers. This subsequently converted into a huge missed call phenomena where the incoming calls to Jio was converted into outgoing calls from Jio to other operators. Since the rival networds kept their 2G voice tariffs high, this led to asymmetric of the off-net voice traffic which was earlier symmetrical for Jio.

Citing such traffic asymmetry as the only ground in the recently floated consultation paper, TRAI had reopened the closed chapter on IUC, which has already been made zero with effect from January 01, 2020 by amendment to IUC Regulations. In this background the consultation paper had created Regulatory uncertainty. This uncertainty was cited by Jio as the compelling factor to 'reluctantly and unavoidably' make a move to recover regulatory charge of 6 paise per minute for all off-net mobile voice calls so long as IUC charges exist.

Nevertheless, Jio has ensured that it stands firm on its commitment to offer the highest value to its customers, and there is no 6 paise per minute charge on:
++ all Jio to Jio calls;
++ all incoming calls;
++ Jio to landline calls; and
++ calls made using WhatsApp or FaceTime and similar platforms.

In addition to this, Jio obliges to provide additional data entitlement of equivalent value based on IUC top-up voucher consumption where the end result is touted as no increase in tariff for customers

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES