Trademark - Ad interim injunction order is not warranted in case of two competing cancer drugs whose name are derived from combining publici juris & whose consumer are doctors & not laymen: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Companies Act, 2013 - High Court u/s 339 is vested with powers to provide relief of interim protection to creditors from alienation of properties belonging to company undergoing liquidation : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Gowda launches 'APNA UREA - Sona Ugle' brand of HURL (See 'Corp Brief') NITI Aayog, Ladakh ink MoU for infra development (See 'Corp Brief') Guidelines for rights issue of units by a listed Infrastructure Investment Trust (InvIT) (See 'Dashboard') Guidelines for rights issue of units by a listed Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) (See 'Dashboard') Format for Statement indicating Deviation or Variation in the use of proceeds of issue of listed non-convertible debt securities or listed non-convertible redeemable preference shares (NCRPs) (See 'Dashboard') China’s Great Wall Motors acquires General Motors Talegaon plant for an undisclosed sum Piramal to sell healthcare insights & analytics business to Clarivate Analytics for USD 950 mn Reliance Communications insolvency: Chinese creditors to delay vote due to New Year from January 25 GeM Samvaad - Users share feedback & inputs (See 'Corpbrief') Exemption from clubbing of investment limit for foreign Government agencies and its related entities (See 'Dashboard') IBC - Liquidation of corporate debtor is preferable if no resolution plan gets acceptance of committee of creditors within time allotted for insolvency process : NCLT (See 'Legal Desk') IBC - If Promoters of corporate debtor fails to avail benefit of being MSME within due time of EoI, Resolution Professional or NCLT cannot be expected to go for fact finding exercise to uncover correct classification of insolvent: NCLAT (See 'Legal Desk') IBBI amends Voluntary Liquidation Process Regulations, 2020 (See 'Corp Brief') Options in Goods - Product Design and Risk Management Framework (See 'Dashboard') Norway looks for possible projects to invest in India (See 'Corp Brief') DCGI approves Wockhardt's antibiotic EMROK in Intravenous & oral forms to treat superbug infections Hinduja Group pulls out from race to acquire Jet Airways; only Synergy Group & Prudent ARC Ltd remains ED summons Air Asia CEO Tony Fernandes on January 20 under PMLA IBBI - Voluntary Liquidation Process - Amendment Regulations, 2020 (See 'Dashboard') IBBI - Govt amends Salary, Allowances and other Terms and Conditions of Service of Chairperson and members Amendment Rules, 2020 (See 'Dashboard') PMLA - If handing over of money laundering case to another counsel is feasible within time, appeal cannot be restored after dismissal for non appearance beyond period prescribed or time allotted: Tribunal (See 'Legal Desk') IBC - Suspension of board of corporate debtor & takeover by Interim Resolution Professional happens without service of order by NCLT or without uploading the order in NCLT website, HC can step in & issue certiorari to set aside admission of insolvency petition: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Budget 2020 - What may cheer up Taxpayers & also FM? (See 'THE COB(WEB)' in TIOL) Hedging of Commodity Price Risk and Freight Risk in Overseas Markets (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2018 - Amendment (See 'Dashboard') House Panel invites inputs on Industrial Relations Code, 2019 (See 'Corp Brief') PCRA to hold mega campaign on fuel conservation from Jan 16, 2020 (See 'Corp Brief') Jeff Bezos: Amazon will export USD 10 bn Make in India goods by 2025

Calls to rival networks; Jio to charge @ Rs 6 paise/min

Published: Oct 09, 2019


NEW DELHI, OCT 09, 2019: RELIANCE Jio, owned by the billionaire Mukesh Ambani has issued a statement today that from now on till such time that TRAI moves to Zero termination of IUC charge regime, the company will charge its customers 6 paise per minute for voice calls made to rival phone networks. To cushion the stance, it was also announced that it will compensate its customers by giving free data of equal value.

Jio cited traffic asymmetry as the cause of such decision where it continued to pay IUC from its own resources to Airtel and Vodafone-Idea et al while offering free voice to its customers despite the repeated stance of TRAI and the amendment already made to the regulations to reduce the IUC to Zero. So far, in the last three years Jio has paid nearly Rs.13,500 crore as NET IUC charges to the other operators.

Interconnect Usage Charge or IUC is a cost paid by one mobile telecom operator to another, when its customers make outgoing mobile calls to the other operator’s customers. These calls between two different networks are known as mobile off-net calls. IUC charges are fixed by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) and are currently at 6 paise per minute.

In an affidavit dated October 29, 2011, TRAI has affirmed its stance towards bringing the IUC charges to zero before the Supreme Court by submitting that the TRAI is of the opinion that there should be progressive reduction in termination charges finally converging to zero termination charge at the end of 2 years from the present. Though the time period to do so was by 2014, at that time neither 4G nor Jio existed. However, after a comprehensive review of the IUC regime through a transparent and elaborate consultation process in 2016, TRAI issued the Telecommunication Interconnection Usage Charges (Thirteenth Amendment) Regulations, 2017 which was placed before the Parliament. The effect of amendment was to reduce IUC for mobile calls from 14 paise/ minute to 6 paise/minute from October 01, 2017 and then reducing the IUC charges to zero from January 01, 2020.

The Reliance Jio statement further lamented that even after the TRAI stance, while the incumbent operators reduced voice tariffs for their 4G customers, they continued to charge exorbitant tariffs to their 35 - 40 crore 2G customers, and in fact increased the tariffs for voice calls to around Rs. 1.50/ minute. The price differential of free voice on Jio network and exorbitantly high tariffs on 2G networks caused the 35 - 40 crore 2G customers of Airtel and Vodafone-Idea to give missed calls to Jio customers. This subsequently converted into a huge missed call phenomena where the incoming calls to Jio was converted into outgoing calls from Jio to other operators. Since the rival networds kept their 2G voice tariffs high, this led to asymmetric of the off-net voice traffic which was earlier symmetrical for Jio.

Citing such traffic asymmetry as the only ground in the recently floated consultation paper, TRAI had reopened the closed chapter on IUC, which has already been made zero with effect from January 01, 2020 by amendment to IUC Regulations. In this background the consultation paper had created Regulatory uncertainty. This uncertainty was cited by Jio as the compelling factor to 'reluctantly and unavoidably' make a move to recover regulatory charge of 6 paise per minute for all off-net mobile voice calls so long as IUC charges exist.

Nevertheless, Jio has ensured that it stands firm on its commitment to offer the highest value to its customers, and there is no 6 paise per minute charge on:
++ all Jio to Jio calls;
++ all incoming calls;
++ Jio to landline calls; and
++ calls made using WhatsApp or FaceTime and similar platforms.

In addition to this, Jio obliges to provide additional data entitlement of equivalent value based on IUC top-up voucher consumption where the end result is touted as no increase in tariff for customers