IWAI hands over Kalughat Intermodal Terminal to PPP Operator (See 'Corp Brief') Chouhan addresses conference of 20,000 farmers in Maharashtra (See 'Corp Brief') India, Bhutan unite in Prayer: Buddha Relics for Global Healing at Thimpu Festival (See 'Corp Brief') NPG evaluates projects from Ministries of Road, Highways & Railways (See 'Corp Brief') PitchX @ ESTIC 2025 Ignites India's DeepTech Future (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Unfair advantage of reputation and goodwill amassed by plaintiff's marks, calls for passing off against defendant: HC (See 'Legal Desk') DGT, Autodesk join hands to enhance Skills for India's Vocational Workforce (See 'Corp Brief') FERA - If exporter chose to realise export proceeds in the Indian Currency, then he had to ensure that export is made within bilateral framework of trade: SAFEMA (See 'Legal Desk') Textiles Mission supports development of Indigenous Thermal Testing Instruments (See 'Corp Brief') Benami - Even if there are cash infusions into bank accounts of alleged benamidar, no provisional attachment can be made in absence of evidence to show that such infusions are made by beneficial owner: SAFEMA (See 'Legal Desk') Ministry of Tourism participates in World Travel Market (See 'Corp Brief') DoT leads thematic session on India's telecom innovation (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Refusal of registration is contingent upon existence of 'likelihood of confusion': HC (See 'Legal Desk') Startup supported by DST demonstrates 500 km Quantum-Safe Network (See 'Corp Brief') Competition Law - Dominance alone does not constitute abuse u/s 4 and competition law will intervene in digital platforms only where market-wide harm, exclusionary conduct, or unfair leveraging is evident: CCI (See 'Legal Desk') MOIL achieves best-ever October Production since Inception (See 'Corp Brief') Competition Law - Back interest charges stemmed from internal bank error constituted contractual dispute and not competition law concern: CCI (See 'Legal Desk') MoS tells NRI scientists - 'You are not outsiders' (See 'Corp Brief') No Blanket cancellations of REIA-Awarded Projects: Govt (See 'Corp Brief') India, Israel ink MoU for co-development & co-production of advanced defence tech (See 'Corp Brief') SARFAESI - CJM's role under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act is limited to ministerial functions and does not involve adjudication: HC (See 'Legal Desk') EPFO, NITI Aayog organize Seminar on Social Security in Electronic Industry (See 'Corp Brief') MeitY generates Rs 41 lakh Scrap Revenue (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Use of essential element in competing marks creates a likelihood of confusion, and continued registration of impugned mark is not permitted: HC (See 'Legal Desk') India strengthens global partnerships with Mauritius and UNESCAP in Doha (See 'Corp Brief') DRDO leads thematic session on 'Electronics & Semiconductor Manufacturing' (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - As per settled precedent, property of equivalent value to proceeds of crime can be attached, even if Appellant is not accused in scheduled offence: SAFEMA Appellate Tribunal (See 'Legal Desk') Scindia hails growth of Indo-French ties at Indo-French North-East Investment Forum (See 'Corp Brief') Misc - Court under Order IX Rule 26 has power to appoint Local Commissioner to ascertain market value of any property, or amount of mesne profits or damages: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Scindia confers Bharat Ratna Hazarika National Awards (See 'Corp Brief') Controller General of Accounts inaugurates Delhi circle Pension Campaign (See 'Corp Brief') Competition Law - Mere dissatisfaction with tender terms or with rejection of bid cannot lead to presumption of imposition of unfair or discriminatory conditions and abuse of dominance: CCI (See 'Legal Desk') Coal India Celebrates 50 Glorious Years of Nation Building (See 'Corp Brief') Scindia lays bricks for Integrated Sohra Tourism Circuit (See 'Corp Brief') Naidu inaugurates creche facility at Udaan Bhawan (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Mere expiry of trademark registration does not, by itself, justify removal from Register, and such removal must be preceded by strict compliance with mandatory requirement of issuing a Form O-3 notice: HC (See 'Legal Desk') GeM organises Session on 'Compliance with Law in Public Procurement' (See 'Corp Brief') MoSPI signs MoU with IICA to develop SDG Alignment Framework (See 'Corp Brief') India's emphasis on overflight in Indo-Pacific is not against any country: RM (See 'Corp Brief') FEMA - Inward remittances labelled 'grants' may be treated as capital account transactions if there are contingent liabilities or obligations that convert them into capital in substance: SAFEMA (See 'Legal Desk') Government intervention and Corporate governance (See CORP EINSICHT)

Calls to rival networks; Jio to charge @ Rs 6 paise/min

Published: Oct 09, 2019

By TIOLCORPLAWS News Service

NEW DELHI, OCT 09, 2019: RELIANCE Jio, owned by the billionaire Mukesh Ambani has issued a statement today that from now on till such time that TRAI moves to Zero termination of IUC charge regime, the company will charge its customers 6 paise per minute for voice calls made to rival phone networks. To cushion the stance, it was also announced that it will compensate its customers by giving free data of equal value.

Jio cited traffic asymmetry as the cause of such decision where it continued to pay IUC from its own resources to Airtel and Vodafone-Idea et al while offering free voice to its customers despite the repeated stance of TRAI and the amendment already made to the regulations to reduce the IUC to Zero. So far, in the last three years Jio has paid nearly Rs.13,500 crore as NET IUC charges to the other operators.

Interconnect Usage Charge or IUC is a cost paid by one mobile telecom operator to another, when its customers make outgoing mobile calls to the other operator’s customers. These calls between two different networks are known as mobile off-net calls. IUC charges are fixed by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) and are currently at 6 paise per minute.

In an affidavit dated October 29, 2011, TRAI has affirmed its stance towards bringing the IUC charges to zero before the Supreme Court by submitting that the TRAI is of the opinion that there should be progressive reduction in termination charges finally converging to zero termination charge at the end of 2 years from the present. Though the time period to do so was by 2014, at that time neither 4G nor Jio existed. However, after a comprehensive review of the IUC regime through a transparent and elaborate consultation process in 2016, TRAI issued the Telecommunication Interconnection Usage Charges (Thirteenth Amendment) Regulations, 2017 which was placed before the Parliament. The effect of amendment was to reduce IUC for mobile calls from 14 paise/ minute to 6 paise/minute from October 01, 2017 and then reducing the IUC charges to zero from January 01, 2020.

The Reliance Jio statement further lamented that even after the TRAI stance, while the incumbent operators reduced voice tariffs for their 4G customers, they continued to charge exorbitant tariffs to their 35 - 40 crore 2G customers, and in fact increased the tariffs for voice calls to around Rs. 1.50/ minute. The price differential of free voice on Jio network and exorbitantly high tariffs on 2G networks caused the 35 - 40 crore 2G customers of Airtel and Vodafone-Idea to give missed calls to Jio customers. This subsequently converted into a huge missed call phenomena where the incoming calls to Jio was converted into outgoing calls from Jio to other operators. Since the rival networds kept their 2G voice tariffs high, this led to asymmetric of the off-net voice traffic which was earlier symmetrical for Jio.

Citing such traffic asymmetry as the only ground in the recently floated consultation paper, TRAI had reopened the closed chapter on IUC, which has already been made zero with effect from January 01, 2020 by amendment to IUC Regulations. In this background the consultation paper had created Regulatory uncertainty. This uncertainty was cited by Jio as the compelling factor to 'reluctantly and unavoidably' make a move to recover regulatory charge of 6 paise per minute for all off-net mobile voice calls so long as IUC charges exist.

Nevertheless, Jio has ensured that it stands firm on its commitment to offer the highest value to its customers, and there is no 6 paise per minute charge on:
++ all Jio to Jio calls;
++ all incoming calls;
++ Jio to landline calls; and
++ calls made using WhatsApp or FaceTime and similar platforms.

In addition to this, Jio obliges to provide additional data entitlement of equivalent value based on IUC top-up voucher consumption where the end result is touted as no increase in tariff for customers

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES