Ministry of Steel holds Interactive Session with Global Diplomats Ahead of 'Bharat Steel 2026' (See 'Corp Brief') Khadse announces unique nationwide ASMITA League to mark International Women's Day (See 'Corp Brief') IPR – Anti-dissection rule, which requires trademarks to be compared as whole, does not apply where part of mark is proven to be dominant feature: HC (See 'Legal Desk') India Summit 2026: Major AI Investment Commitments made (See 'Corp Brief') Joshi commends CWC's Contribution to India's Food Security (See 'Corp Brief') SEBI - Termination of a major acquisition agreement constituted a material event requiring clear & conspicuous disclosure under Regulation 30 of the LODR Regulations: SAT (See 'Legal Desk') India invites the world to study, innovate and grow together (See 'Corp Brief') SEBI - Investor decisions & share prices are significantly influenced by disclosures relating to acquisitions & corporate developments, ergo, failure to transparently disclose termination undermines market integrity: SAT (See 'Legal Desk') Controller General of Communication Accounts inaugurates North Zone Review Meeting (See 'Corp Brief') National Arogya Fair 2026 concludes in Shegaon (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - For purpose of passing-off claim, prior use of composite trademark is sufficient to establish prior use of its essential and source-identifying component: HC (See 'Legal Desk') APEDA organises Sikkim Organic Conclave-cum-International Buyer Seller Meet in Gangtok (See 'Corp Brief') 'Double Engine' Momentum Can Fast-Track Kerala's Progress: MoS (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Waiver of rights under contract such as debenture trust deed cannot be implied if agreement explicitly requires such waiver to be in writing: SC (See 'Legal Desk') IBC - Manner in which bank classifies loan as non-performing asset for accounting or provisioning purposes does not determine IBC, if debt was restructured and acknowledged in fresh agreements: SC (See 'Legal Desk') IBC - corporate restructuring under IBC must be prioritized over stalled and ineffective proceedings under Companies Act to protect public funds and larger economic interest: SC (See 'Legal Desk') IBC - NCLT can't Reject Sec 7 application citing corporate debtor's financial health, once twin requirements of debt & default are established: SC LB (See 'Legal Desk') IBC - Moratorium u/s 14 of IBC is intended to preserve debtor's estate from creditor actions aimed at debt recovery, but does not interdict sovereign proceedings in rem for attachment or confiscation under Benami Act: SC (See 'Legal Desk') Supreme Court Clears Path For Single Insolvency Proceedings Against Linked Group Companies (See CORP EINSICHT)

CCI imposes Rs 13 Cr penalty on Jaypee Group for abuse of dominant position

Published: Aug 13, 2019

By TIOLCORPLAWS News Service

NEW DELHI, AUG 13, 2019: THE Competition Commission of India ( CCI ) has found Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL) to be in contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 ( Act ) for abuse of dominant position in the market of independent residential units such as villas, estate homes in their integrated township, by imposing unfair/ discriminatory conditions on the allottees in Wish Town, Jaypee Greens project, in Noida and Greater Noida. The final order was passed on an information filed by a buyer who alleged that conditions imposed by JAL were arbitrary and heavily tilted in favour of it.

Based on the investigation, the Commission found that the standard terms and conditions imposed by JAL were one-sided and couched in a manner so as to unilaterally favour itself and be unfavourable to the consumers. Moreover, terms were vague and did not confer any substantive rights on the buyers. The conduct of JAL, such as collecting money/charges from the buyers without delivering the residential/dwelling unit on time, adding additional construction and amending /altering the layout plans, imposition of various charges, right to raise finance from any bank/financial institution/body corporate without consulting buyers was held to be abusive.

Therefore, the Commission concluded such conduct of JAL to be in violation of Section 4(2)(a)(i) of the Act. Resultantly, the Commission imposed a penalty of Rs 13.82 crore (Rupees Thirteen Crore Eighty Two Lakh) on JAL. The penalty was calculated @ 5% of the average revenue of JAL from sale of independent residential units in the relevant market. Besides, a cease and desist order has also been issued to JAL.

A copy of the order passed in Case No. 99 of 2014 under Section 27 of the Act has been uploaded on the website of CCI.

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES