IICA convenes 5th Inter-Ministerial Consultation on Responsible Business Conduct and ESG (See 'Corp Brief') BCCL Organizes Interaction with NRS Linkage and CIL SWMA e-Auction Consumers (See 'Corp Brief') Madnaviya & Kumaraswamy lay foundation of indoor sports complex in Karnataka (See 'Corp Brief') A&C - Juridical seat of arbitration is determinative factor for conferring exclusive supervisory jurisdiction on court: HC (See 'Legal Desk') India's progress in reducing Tuberculosis Incidence has Outpaced Global Average: Nadda (See 'Corp Brief') Rs 100 crore sanctioned for Integrated Aqua Park Project in Anantnag (See 'Corp Brief') Reddy inaugurates Multiple Projects in WCL (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - If mortgaged properties are to be auctioned by bank or settled with borrower which may result in concealment, it would be only of those properties which was considered to be assets disproportionate to known source: SAFEMA (See 'Legal Desk') India moving from Healthcare Follower to Global Leader in Precision Medicine and Biomanufacturing: MoS (See 'Corp Brief') Companies Act - Technical provisions of Companies Act cannot be relied on to evade compliance with a Court decree prohibiting the judgment debtor from transferring the shares to any third party: HC (See 'Legal Desk') SECL's Vigilance-led Initiative 'Prayas' Ensures Timely PF & Pension Settlement (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - Appearance of Appellant, ordinarily operating in Mumbai, before SAFEMA Appellate Tribunal at Delhi, does not confer territorial jurisdiction to the Delhi High Court over Appellant: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Agrinnovate India presents Rs.3.4 Crore dividend to Chouhan (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Once Resolution Plan is approved by NCLT u/s 31 of IBC, it becomes binding on all stakeholders, and all claims not provided for in plan stand extinguished: HC (See 'Legal Desk') 6 Railway Stations in West Bengal redeveloped under Amrit Bharat Station Scheme (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Party seeking cancellation of registered trademark on grounds of similarity and prior rights must first establish its own prior and continuous use of its mark as trademark: HC (See 'Legal Desk') NHAI receives warm response from Bidders for Construction of Kaliabor to Numaligarh Section of NH (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Application of Discount for Lack of Marketability is permissible valuation methodology under Indian Accounting Standards for determining fair value of unlisted, illiquid shares in context of capital reduction: SC (See 'Legal Desk') Supreme Court Clears Path For Single Insolvency Proceedings Against Linked Group Companies (See CORP EINSICHT)

CCI imposes Rs 13 Cr penalty on Jaypee Group for abuse of dominant position

Published: Aug 13, 2019

By TIOLCORPLAWS News Service

NEW DELHI, AUG 13, 2019: THE Competition Commission of India ( CCI ) has found Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL) to be in contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 ( Act ) for abuse of dominant position in the market of independent residential units such as villas, estate homes in their integrated township, by imposing unfair/ discriminatory conditions on the allottees in Wish Town, Jaypee Greens project, in Noida and Greater Noida. The final order was passed on an information filed by a buyer who alleged that conditions imposed by JAL were arbitrary and heavily tilted in favour of it.

Based on the investigation, the Commission found that the standard terms and conditions imposed by JAL were one-sided and couched in a manner so as to unilaterally favour itself and be unfavourable to the consumers. Moreover, terms were vague and did not confer any substantive rights on the buyers. The conduct of JAL, such as collecting money/charges from the buyers without delivering the residential/dwelling unit on time, adding additional construction and amending /altering the layout plans, imposition of various charges, right to raise finance from any bank/financial institution/body corporate without consulting buyers was held to be abusive.

Therefore, the Commission concluded such conduct of JAL to be in violation of Section 4(2)(a)(i) of the Act. Resultantly, the Commission imposed a penalty of Rs 13.82 crore (Rupees Thirteen Crore Eighty Two Lakh) on JAL. The penalty was calculated @ 5% of the average revenue of JAL from sale of independent residential units in the relevant market. Besides, a cease and desist order has also been issued to JAL.

A copy of the order passed in Case No. 99 of 2014 under Section 27 of the Act has been uploaded on the website of CCI.

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES