India, Kenya hold Working Group Meeting on Agriculture through Virtual Mode (See 'Corp Brief') NIFTEM-K to organise Global Platform with Participation from 25 Countries (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Moratorium u/s 14 of IBC is intended to preserve debtor's estate from creditor actions aimed at debt recovery, but does not interdict sovereign proceedings in rem for attachment or confiscation under Benami Act: SC (See 'Legal Desk') ESIC commences 75th Foundation Year Celebrations (See 'Corp Brief') Misc - Telecom operator is liable to pay reserve price fixed for November 2012, 2G spectrum auction from February 2, 2012, date on which its licence stood quashed: SC (See 'Legal Desk') Stakeholder Consultation held for inputs on proposed Advanced Manufacturing Systems Mission (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Registration of Device Mark is to be considered as whole and while determining deceptive similarity with another Trade Mark: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Biotechnology will power next industrial revolution: MoS (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Trademark could not be removed simply for non-use: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Union Minister inaugurates Special Handloom Expo (See 'Corp Brief') India, Brazil sign TKDL Access Agreement for protection of Patent (See 'Corp Brief') Memorandum of Cooperation signed between Digital Bharat Nidhi and AP (See 'Corp Brief') IPR - Registered mark is liable to be removed if not used for continuous period of five years & three months prior to filing of petition, unless special circumstances are shown: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Footwear Design and Development Institute celebrates 5th Convocation Ceremony (See 'Corp Brief') 96% houses under PMAY-U 2.0 allotted for women (See 'Corp Brief') SEBI - Adjudication proceedings are nullified where the noticee has ceased to exist on account of being struck off the RoC: SEBI (See 'Legal Desk') India-Brazil MoU signed to Deepen MSME Cooperation (See 'Corp Brief') IFSCA-IICA unveil Strategic Roadmap to institutionalize Corporate Governance Ecosystem at GIFT-IFSC (See 'Corp Brief') Grant support extended to 5 Innovators under CSR-backed Programme (See 'Corp Brief') Misc - Notice u/s 91 of CrPC cannot be issued to accused person to compel them to furnish information that is based on their personal knowledge: HC (See 'Legal Desk') MoS holds bilateral Talks with Rwanda ICT Minister (See 'Corp Brief') India, Brazil sign MoU to strengthen and secure steel supply chain (See 'Corp Brief') Misc - SICA - failure to repay dues or subsequent financial incapacity cannot constitute cheating in he absence of fraudulent intent at time of inducement: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Supreme Court Clears Path For Single Insolvency Proceedings Against Linked Group Companies (See CORP EINSICHT)

CCI imposes Rs 13 Cr penalty on Jaypee Group for abuse of dominant position

Published: Aug 13, 2019

By TIOLCORPLAWS News Service

NEW DELHI, AUG 13, 2019: THE Competition Commission of India ( CCI ) has found Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL) to be in contravention of the provisions of Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 ( Act ) for abuse of dominant position in the market of independent residential units such as villas, estate homes in their integrated township, by imposing unfair/ discriminatory conditions on the allottees in Wish Town, Jaypee Greens project, in Noida and Greater Noida. The final order was passed on an information filed by a buyer who alleged that conditions imposed by JAL were arbitrary and heavily tilted in favour of it.

Based on the investigation, the Commission found that the standard terms and conditions imposed by JAL were one-sided and couched in a manner so as to unilaterally favour itself and be unfavourable to the consumers. Moreover, terms were vague and did not confer any substantive rights on the buyers. The conduct of JAL, such as collecting money/charges from the buyers without delivering the residential/dwelling unit on time, adding additional construction and amending /altering the layout plans, imposition of various charges, right to raise finance from any bank/financial institution/body corporate without consulting buyers was held to be abusive.

Therefore, the Commission concluded such conduct of JAL to be in violation of Section 4(2)(a)(i) of the Act. Resultantly, the Commission imposed a penalty of Rs 13.82 crore (Rupees Thirteen Crore Eighty Two Lakh) on JAL. The penalty was calculated @ 5% of the average revenue of JAL from sale of independent residential units in the relevant market. Besides, a cease and desist order has also been issued to JAL.

A copy of the order passed in Case No. 99 of 2014 under Section 27 of the Act has been uploaded on the website of CCI.

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES