IBC-RERA conflict may increase litigations: Assocham
Published: Apr 23, 2018
By TIOLCORPLAWS News Service
"The fundamental contradiction between these two may drag cases to judicial and legal forums," the paper said.
“The conflict between IBC and RERA came to the fore in quite a few bankruptcy proceeding in the recent times.... In a way, IBC and RERA have areas where there are possibilities of conflict in operation. While IBC allows companies to file for bankruptcy to provide relief to debtors or creditors, RERA looks at providing relief to homebuyers and seeks to hold developers or builders responsible if the project is delayed,” said an Assocham - Thought Arbitrage paper.
As per provisions of the IBC, homebuyers are 'unsecured creditors' and as a result their priority to be compensated comes after those institutional or other creditors who have provided loans to the developer. Scope for confusion prevails as for both RERA and IBC, the law states that it will prevail over other laws, it said.
"The two laws enacted in 2016 may have the best of intentions, but the IBC and RERA appear to be pitted against each other when it comes to resolving interest of bankers and homebuyers," the paper said.
In the latest case related to an Amrapali project, the Apex Court held that financial creditors cannot take over homes belonging to the homebuyers. In other words, the Apex Court upheld the rights of homebuyers ahead of the creditors, it said.
This amply demonstrates the fundamental contradiction between IBC and RERA – while one tries to give primacy to the creditors the other tries to put consumers before creditors. Since IBC was legislated in May 2016, after RERA was passed in March 2016, legal experts opine that the Insolvency Act will override RERA, in case of a conflict. In some cases, that might undermine the actual objective of consumer security, with which RERA was enacted, it added.
