Diaspora vital connectors between India and global innovation ecosystems: MoS (See 'Corp Brief') Srinagar Khel Sankalp affirms unified commitment to athlete-centric sports ecosystem (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - If corporate debtor is solvent & functioning company, then insolvency process invoked only to secure payment of individual dues by initiation of CIRP, amounts to misuse of IBC as recovery mechanism: SC (See 'Legal Desk') Reining in Misuse of IBC for Recovery (See CORP EINSICHT) SAMAVESH Portal, NMBA 2.0, SETU and SMILE Beggary Apps Launched at Chandigarh Shivir (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - Attachment of a residential property upheld where Act itself permits attachment not only of property directly acquired from proceeds of crime, but also of untainted property representing equivalent value where actual proceeds of crime are unavailable or untraceable: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Veep urges Youth to become Job Creators and Nation-Builders (See 'Corp Brief') CCIC launches 'Soul Threads' - A Heritage Designer Collection Celebrating Artisanal Legacy (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - If statutory authority, during subsistence of moratorium u/s 14, directs bank to place lien on bank accounts of Corporate Debtor, and bank acts on same, it would amount to execution against Corporate Debtor and is barred by Sec 14: NCLT (See 'Legal Desk') IPR - As Constitutional Court under Article 215 of Constitution, appropriate orders are warranted to ensure that its directions are not taken in perfunctory or dismissive manner: HC (See 'Legal Desk') Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 - Mere involvement of cash does not exclude transaction from ambit of benami, particularly where source is undisclosed & transaction is structured to legitimize unaccounted money during demonetization: SAFEMA Tribunal (See 'Legal Desk') PMLA - Mere fact that some allegations in predicate FIR were quashed, or that attached property was allegedly purchased before crime period, did not invalidate attachment if companies were recipients of proceeds of crime: SAFEMA (See 'Legal Desk')

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC)

Published: Apr 20, 2017

FEATURES AND INSTITUTIONAL SETUP

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) was passed by the Parliament on 11 May 2016, received Presidential assent on 28 May 2016 and was notified in the official gazette on the same day. IBC aims to consolidate and amend the laws relating to reorganization and insolvency resolution of corporate persons, partnership firms and individuals in a time bound manner for maximization of value of assets of such persons, to promote entrepreneurship, availability of credit and balance the interests of all the stakeholders including alteration in the order of priority of payment of Government dues and to establish an Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.

This act has an overriding effect on multiple laws for the recovery of debts and insolvency and liquidation process like Chapter XIX & Chapter XX of Companies Act, 2013, Chapter XIX & Chapter XX of Companies Act, 2013, RDDBFI Act, 1993, SARFAESI Act, 2002, SICA Act, 1985, The Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909, The Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, Chapter XIII of the LLP Act, 2008 .

All these laws were inadequate to provide a single clearance or single window resolution system and many a time authorities with different jurisdiction and agencies overlapped and resulted in delayed case solving process and further complexities.

This article covers the key features or requirement of Act and framework of Act.

Key features of the IBC are:

• The code would have an overriding effect on all other laws relating to Insolvency &Bankruptcy. This code includes all persons including corporate, individuals, partnership firms and LLPs as well, however it shall not be applicable to corporate persons who are regulated financial service providers like Banks, Financial Institution (FIs) and Insurance Companies .

• IBC aims at consolidating all existing insolvency related laws as well as amending multiple legislation including the Companies Act. The code has replaced multiple laws covering the recovery of debts and insolvency and liquidation process and provides single window clearance to all the matters pertaining to insolvency and bankruptcy and applicant gets the appropriate relief at the same authority unlike earlier position of law where laws and authorities overlapped each other.

• The code aims to resolve insolvencies in a strict time-bound manner - the evaluation and viability determination must be completed within 180 days. The code provides fixed time frame for insolvency matters for companies and individuals. The process is to be completed within 180 days (Moratorium period) and will be extended by 90 days more. So the matters have to be resolved in not more that 270 days. Also there is a fast-track resolution process for corporate insolvency in 90 days and if it cannot be resolved assets of borrower can be sold in order to repay the creditors.

• Insolvency professionals to take over the management of the Company. IBC proposes a paradigm shift from the existing Debtor in possession' to a ‘Creditor in control' regime.

• There is a simple and clear Framework of authorities under the Act. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) will adjudicate insolvency resolution for companies and Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) will adjudicate insolvency resolution for individual.

• Sets clearly order of priority at the time of liquidation i.e.

• Insolvency related costs

• Secured creditors and workmen dues up to 24 months

• Other employee's salaries/dues up to 12 months

• Financial debts (unsecured creditors)

• Government dues (up to 2 years)

• Any remaining debts and dues

• Equity

Institutional Setup under IEC

The Act provides a time bound process for speedy disposal of the matters and for maximization of value of assets, promotes entrepreneurship, improves ease of doing business and also protects the interest of workman and employees. It provides a base to create a good environment for business and benefit to all. The Implementation of any law not only depends on good framework of law but also on effective and efficient functioning of institutions involved in the administration and execution of the same. The IBC is based on five pillars and they are:

IBB - Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India- This is the apex body for regulating, promoting transparency & governance in the administration of the IBC; will be involved in setting up the infrastructure and accrediting IPs & IUs; also perform legislative, quasi-judicial function with respect to IPs & IUs and IPAs.

IUs - Information Utilities: This is the centralized depository of financial and credit information of borrowers; would collect, collate and disseminate financial data provided by creditors.

IPs - Insolvency professional - The persons enrolled with IPA and regulated by Board and IPA will conduct resolution process; to act as Liquidator/ bankruptcy trustee; appointed by creditors and override the powers of board of directors. The role of IP includes a wide range of function which includes adhering to procedure of law, accounting as well as finance related functions.

Adjudicating authority (AA) - This would be the NCLT for corporate insolvency; to entertain or dispose any insolvency application, approve/ reject resolution plans, decide in respect of claims or matters of law/ facts thereof.

IPA - Insolvency Professional Agencies - This is registered by the board and shall enroll IPs as its members in accordance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with its regulations.

Conclusion: The IBC is not only a well-drafted law but also has a strong institutional set up.

(Author is a Practicing Company Secretary)

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES