REC to extend loan of Rs 1869 Cr for Kiru Hydro Electric Project (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Even if CIRP commences, Directors, who are incharge of affairs of Company cannot be absolved of any wilful default committed by borrower Company : HC (See 'Legal Desk') CCO declares grading of coal and lignite mines (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process can be initiated for failure to repay debt due and payable : NCLT (See 'Legal Desk') SARFAESI Act - Writ petition can be disposed of as infructuous as one time settlement has been entered into between parties : HC (See 'Legal Desk') PM addresses Conference on Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (See 'Corp Brief') SARFAESI Act - Award of interest on auction money at rate applicable to fixed deposits is not a correct view and rate of interest deserves to be enhanced: SC (See 'Legal Desk') CCI okays subscription to debentures of Napino Auto by IFC (See 'Corp Brief') Constitution of India - Writ jurisdiction of Court cannot be used by party for collecting evidence and documents against another party, against whom petitioner has pending disputes : HC (See 'Legal Desk') World Energy Congress 2024: Power Secy, Ambassador to Netherlands inaugurate India Pavilion (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - Considering money trail and involvement of applicant in crime he is not entitled for anticipatory bail : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Competition Act - Informant has neither referred to any particular agreement nor provided any document which suggest existence of anti-competitive agreement : CCI (See 'Legal Desk') CSIR implements new in-house 'Accounts Manager Software' for financial management (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - Applicant is not entitled for grant of anticipatory bail u/s 45 of PMLA as Court does not find any reasonable ground to believe that applicant is not guilty of crime : HC (See 'Legal Desk') SARFAESI Act - Petition has been filed to overreach recovery proceedings, wherein Petitioners have been found to be liable to pay certain amount so as to circumvent provisions of statutory appeal : HC (See 'Legal Desk') IREDA reports All-Time High Annual Net Profit, NPAs below 1% (See 'Corp Brief') SARFAESI Act - District Magistrate is under statutory obligation to decide application u/s 14 of the SARFAESI Act within thirty days : HC (See 'Legal Desk') IBC - Wilful defaulter proceeding cannot be relatable to recovery of debt but is merely an off-shoot of debt : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Competition Act - Since it is agreement between enterprise and end consumer, same is not covered within ambit of Section 3(4) of Act: CCI (See 'Legal Desk') Govt announces election of 11 members Veterinary Council of India (See 'Corp Brief') Companies Act - Charges of professional misconduct in SCN are proved for which monetary penalty can be imposed : NFRA (See 'Legal Desk') PMLA - Application for anticipatory bail can be rejected as there is failure on part of applicant to appear before trial Court despite service of bailable warrant : HC (See 'Legal Desk') IBC - There is no scope of interference in writ petition since there is no arbitrariness, mala fides or palpably illegality in impugned order : HC (See 'Legal Desk')

SEBI debars RIL for 1 year from equity derivative market

Published: Mar 25, 2017

By TIOLCORP News Service

MUMBAI, MAR 25, 2017: THE Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) late on Friday barred Mukesh Ambani-led Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) from accessing the equity derivatives segment for a year and has told the company to disgorge Rs 447.27 crore along with an interest of 12 per cent since November 29, 2007, in a ten year old insider trading case involving its erstwhile arm Reliance Petroleum Ltd (RPL). The total penalty of RIL after adding interest comes close to Rs 1,300 crore.

The ban, which will come into effective immediately, will restrict India's second most valued company from the derivatives market for a year, SEBI said in a 54-page order on Friday.

The Sebi order passed by whole time member G Mahalingam has directed the company to disgorge the "unlawful gains" made by it within 45 days of the order. According to the Sebi order, RIL has made "unlawful gains of Rs 513 crore" by adopting "fraudulent and manipulative strategy/pattern".

"In my view, there is a fraudulent scheme carried out by Noticee No.1 (RIL) through the 12 connected persons/ front entities with the intention of making profits on account of the legally impermissible limits held by it clandestinely and lowering the price in the cash market," said Mahalingam's order. "Throughout its written and oral submissions, Noticee No. 1 has referred to its actions as 'hedging' to justify its elaborate scheme. The strategy of 'hedging', put forward as a defence by Noticee No.1 is nothing but a mirage," said the order.

In March 2007, RIL Board decided to raise RIL board decides to raise resources by off-loading about 5% of its holdings in RPL.

In November 2007 RIL undertook transactions in the cash segment of RPL enlisted services of 12 agents to operate on its behalf in the futures segment of RPL.

Between November 1 to November 6,2007, the 12 agents took substantial positions in the November futures contract of RPL. As a result, on November 06, 2007, the holding in derivatives contracts RPL reached 95% of the market-wide position limit, thereby inviting upon it a restriction of no further increase in open interest. Sebi started investigation into the matter. Analyses price-volume trends in the cash market vis-a-vis the F&O segment.

On December 16, 2010, Sebi issued show-cause notice to RIL and all the other 12 entities alleging violations of fraudulent and unfair trade practices regulations.

RIL has asked for a consent settlement order previously but Sebi had rejected its plea. In 2014, RIL's appeal in the SAT against Sebi's refusal to agree to a consent order was also not successful. Subsequently, Sebi continued the investigation of its case and RIL and 12 other entities presented their defence in January this year.

The regulator said Reliance Industries, by employing 12 entities to take separate position limits of open interest on its behalf, by executing separate agreements with each one of them and cornering 93.63% of the November stock futures of RPL, has acted in a fraudulent manner. It cannot be held to be a mere breach of position limits by the clients attracting penalty under the exchange circulars.  

The regulator said on the basis of the analysis of the trading strategy adopted by RIL in the cash market during the month of November 2007, and specifically on November 29, 2007 - the expiry day of the November Futures of RPL - there has been a manipulation of the last half an hour settlement price.  

The SEBI in its order observed that:

"Entrusting a common person to carry out the trades in both cash and F&O segment was the other key factor in the whole operation. Finally when the price dipped on November 29, the entire F&O open positions to the extent of 7.97 crore shares was allowed to expire. In the meanwhile, 1.95 crore shares were also liquidated in the cash segment.  

"This is not a normal case of price manipulation or volume manipulation. This is a case of a unique strategy of per se not manipulating the price or volume in a single market, but manipulating the settlement price in one market to gain across the volumes accumulated in the other market. The actual manipulation has happened with respect to the convergence price of the spot with the futures,".  

RIL said it will appeal to Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) challenging SEBI's order.

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES