Constitution of India - Where more than one interpretation can be given to Court's order, then benefit has to be given to party against whom contempt is alleged: HC (See 'Legal Desk') SEBI Act - Merely attending board meetings cannot lead to conclusion that appellant is involved in day to day affairs of Company: SAT (See 'Legal Desk') Competition Act - Grievances of Informants like payment of maintenance and electricity charges is in nature of contractual issue and disputes not having any Competition concern: CCI (See 'Legal Desk') India attends G20 Working Group Meeting at Brasilia (See 'Corp Brief') SEBI ICDR Regulations, 2018 - By not locking entire pre-preferential allotment shareholding of two allottees Noticee violated SEBI ICDR Regulations : SEBI (See 'Legal Desk') Arbitration Act - Serving officer of respondent shall act as arbitrator is invalid stipulation which makes it incumbent on Court to appoint independent sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes : HC (See 'Legal Desk') SEBI Act - Appellant is misleading its investors that it is registered with SEBI as investment advisor and played fraud in violation of IA Regulations : SAT (See 'Legal Desk') CCI okays subscription to CCPS B of API Holdings by MEMG LLP and 360 ONE (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - Court will not cancel interim bail granted to respondent as interim bail is about to expire within short period of time : HC (See 'Legal Desk') CCI approves 100% acquisition of Lanco Amarkantak Power by Adani (See 'Corp Brief') CGST Act - Case does not fall under ambit of Anti-Profiteering provisions of CGST Act : CCI (See 'Legal Desk') BRO connects strategic Nimmu-Padam-Darcha road in Ladakh (See 'Corp Brief') Arbitration Act - Any party having failed to make substantive claim in arbitral proceedings, cannot seek recovery by way of interim mandatory injunction u/s 17 : HC (See 'Legal Desk') SEBI Act - Trading pattern of appellants with other noticees indicate that there is meeting of mind between appellants and other noticees : SAT (See 'Legal Desk') SARFAESI Act - Respondent shall not take any coercive steps against Petitioner prior to 15th March, 2024 provided Petitioners file appeal before DRAT on or before March 01, 2024 : HC (See 'Legal Desk') Guj Govt sets up Telecom Facilitation Centre to support stakeholders (See 'Corp Brief') SEBI Act - SEBI shall not initiate any enforcement action against Applicant for SAST violations provided representation made in settlement proceedings are subsequently not found untrue : SEBI (See 'Legal Desk') India, Bhutan ink MoUs on clean energy, agriculture & tourism (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - Surgery of knee cannot be categorized as 'life-threatening situation' and surgery which is to be undergone by applicant is not of such nature which necessitates applicant's release on interim bail only : HC (See 'Legal Desk') NCC, NPCIL ink MoU to raise awareness on peaceful use of nuclear power (See 'Corp Brief') SEBI - Any violation committed by Company which is fraudulent in nature has to be attributed to individual acting as Director at relevant point of time : SAT (See 'Legal Desk') Golden Jubilee Celebration of KVKs held in Puducherry (See 'Corp Brief') PMLA - Court declined to grant bail to Satyendar Jain in money laundering case and also cancelled interim bail granted as there are sufficient material collected by ED to show that he is prima facie guilty of alleged offences : SC (See 'Legal Desk') 42nd IPHE Steering Committee to be hosted by EU (See 'Corp Brief') IBC - Application filed u/s 7 of code can be admitted as debt and default has been established : NCLT (See 'Legal Desk')

Competition Commission imposes huge penalties on 10 cement companies for cartelisation; Rs 398 Crore penalty on Shree Cement

Published: Aug 31, 2016

By TIOLCORP News Service

NEW DELHI, AUG 31, 2016: THE Competition Commission of India (CCI) has imposed penalties upon 10 cement companies and their trade association i.e. Cement Manufacturers Association (CMA) for cartelisation in the cement industry.

The final order has been passed by CCI pursuant to the directions issued by Competition Appellate Tribunal remanding the matter back while setting aside the original order of CCI.

The information in the present case was filed by Builders Association of India under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 (the Act) against the cement companies and CMA alleging contravention of the provisions of the Act.

While holding the cement companies and CMA in contravention of the Act, it was noted by CCI that the cement companies used the platform provided by CMA and shared details relating to prices, capacity utilisation, production and dispatch and thereby restricted production and supplies in the market, contravening the provisions of Section 3(1) read with Section 3(3)(b) of the Act. Further, CCI also found the cement companies to be acting in concert in fixing prices of cement in contravention of the provisions of Section 3(1) read with Section 3(3)(a) of the Act.

Accordingly, penalties of Rs. 1147.59 crores (ACC), Rs. 1163.91 crores (ACL), Rs. 167.32 crores (Binani), Rs. 274.02 crores (Century), Rs. 187.48 crores (India Cements), Rs. 128.54 crores (J K Cements), Rs. 490.01 crores (Lafarge), Rs. 258.63 crores (Ramco), Rs. 1175.49 crores (UltraTech) and Rs. 1323.60 crores (Jaiprakash Associates Limited) have been imposed by CCI. In addition, a penalty of Rs. 0.73 crore has also been imposed on CMA. While imposing penalties, the Commission noted the action of the cement companies and CMA as being not only detrimental to the interests of consumers but also as detrimental to the whole economy, as cement is a critical input in construction and infrastructure industry – and thus vital for the economic development of the country.

The cement companies and CMA have been directed to cease and desist from indulging in any activity relating to agreement, understanding or arrangement on prices, production and supply of cement in the market. CMA has been further directed to disengage and disassociate itself from collecting wholesale and retail prices through member cement companies or otherwise. Also, CMA has been restrained from collecting and circulating the details relating to production and dispatch by cement companies.

While highlighting the role played by trade associations in promoting the interests of their members and the industry they serve, CCI noted in its order that cement companies were interacting using the platform made available by the trade association (CMA). Such interactions have been found to have transgressed the limits in sharing of information and extended to discussions on cost, prices, production and capacities, thereby, facilitating the enterprises to determine prices and production in a concerted and collusive manner, than in a competitive manner. CCI cautioned that all those who participate in association activities, through meetings or otherwise, whether as a member or an executive or manager or employee, have to be sensitive to the discussions not transgressing advertently or otherwise into anti-trust behaviour or practices.

Vide separate order, CCI has also imposed a penalty of Rs. 397.51 crore upon Shree Cement Limited in RTPE No. 52 of 2006.

TIOL CORP SEARCH

TIOL GROUP WEBSITES